Smoke from an Israeli strike rises over the Gaza Strip. (AP, Hatem Moussa)
Israel has killed almost 800 Palestinians in the past twenty-one days
in the Gaza Strip alone; its onslaught continues. The UN estimates that
more than 74 percent of those killed are civilians. That is to be
expected in a population of 1.8 million where the number of Hamas
members is approximately 15,000. Israel does not deny that it killed
those Palestinians using modern aerial technology and precise weaponry
courtesy of the world’s only superpower. In fact, it does not even deny
that they are civilians.
Israel’s propaganda machine, however, insists that these Palestinians wanted to die (“culture of martyrdom”), staged their own death (“telegenically dead”) or were the tragic victims of Hamas’s use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes (“human shielding”).
In all instances, the military power is blaming the victims for their
own deaths, accusing them of devaluing life and attributing this
disregard to cultural bankruptcy. In effect, Israel—along with
uncritical mainstream media that unquestionably accept this
discourse—dehumanizes Palestinians, deprives them even of their
victimhood and legitimizes egregious human rights and legal violations.
This is not the first time. The gruesome images of decapitated
children’s bodies and stolen innocence on Gaza’s shores are a dreadful
repeat of Israel’s assault on Gaza in November 2012 and winter 2008–09.
Not only are the military tactics the same but so too are the public
relations efforts and the faulty legal arguments that underpin the
attacks. Mainstream media news anchors are inexplicably accepting these arguments as fact.
Below I address five of Israel’s recurring talking points. I hope this proves useful to newsmakers.
1) Israel is exercising its right to self-defense.
As the occupying power of the Gaza Strip, and the Palestinian Territories more broadly, Israel has an obligation and a duty
to protect the civilians under its occupation. It governs by military
and law enforcement authority to maintain order, protect itself and
protect the civilian population under its occupation. It cannot
simultaneously occupy the territory, thus usurping the self-governing
powers that would otherwise belong to Palestinians, and declare war upon
them. These contradictory policies (occupying a land and then declaring
war on it) make the Palestinian population doubly vulnerable.
The precarious and unstable conditions in the Gaza Strip from which
Palestinians suffer are Israel’s responsibility. Israel argues that it
can invoke the right to self-defense
under international law as defined in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The
International Court of Justice, however, rejected this faulty legal
interpretation in its 2004 Advisory Opinion.
The ICJ explained that an armed attack that would trigger Article 51
must be attributable to a sovereign state, but the armed attacks by
Palestinians emerge from within Israel’s jurisdictional control. Israel
does have the right to defend itself against rocket attacks, but it must
do so in accordance with occupation law and not other laws of war.
Occupation law ensures greater protection for the civilian population.
The other laws of war balance military advantage and civilian suffering.
The statement that “no country would tolerate rocket fire from a
neighboring country” is therefore both a diversion and baseless.
Israel denies Palestinians the right to govern and protect
themselves, while simultaneously invoking the right to self-defense.
This is a conundrum and a violation of international law, one that
Israel deliberately created to evade accountability.
2) Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005.
Israel argues that its occupation of the Gaza Strip ended with the
unilateral withdrawal of its settler population in 2005. It then
declared the Gaza Strip to be “hostile territory” and declared war
against its population. Neither the argument nor the statement is tenable.
Despite removing 8,000 settlers and the military infrastructure that
protected their illegal presence, Israel maintained effective control of
the Gaza Strip and thus remains the occupying power as defined by
Article 47 of the Hague Regulations. To date, Israel maintains control
of the territory’s air space, territorial waters, electromagnetic
sphere, population registry and the movement of all goods and people.
Israel argues that the withdrawal from Gaza demonstrates that ending
the occupation will not bring peace. Some have gone so far as to say
that Palestinians squandered their opportunity to build heaven
in order to build a terrorist haven instead. These arguments aim to
obfuscate Israel’s responsibilities in the Gaza Strip, as well as the
West Bank. As Prime Minister Netanyahu once explained, Israel must
ensure that it does not “get another Gaza in Judea and Samaria…. I think
the Israeli people understand now what I always say: that there cannot
be a situation, under any agreement, in which we relinquish security
control of the territory west of the River Jordan.”
Palestinians have yet to experience a day of self-governance. Israel
immediately imposed a siege upon the Gaza Strip when Hamas won
parliamentary elections in January 2006 and tightened it severely when
Hamas routed Fatah in June 2007. The siege has created a “humanitarian catastrophe”
in the Gaza Strip. Inhabitants will not be able to access clean water,
electricity or tend to even the most urgent medical needs. The World
Health Organization explains that the Gaza Strip will be unlivable
by 2020. Not only did Israel not end its occupation, it has created a
situation in which Palestinians cannot survive in the long-term.
3) This Israeli operation, among others, was caused by rocket fire from Gaza.
Israel claims that its current and past wars against the Palestinian
population in Gaza have been in response to rocket fire. Empirical
evidence from 2008, 2012 and 2014 refute that claim. First, according to
Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the greatest reduction of rocket fire came through diplomatic rather than military means. This chart
demonstrates the correlation between Israel’s military attacks upon the
Gaza Strip and Hamas militant activity. Hamas rocket fire increases in
response to Israeli military attacks and decreases in direct correlation
to them. Cease-fires have brought the greatest security to the region.
During the four months of the Egyptian-negotiated cease-fire in 2008,
Palestinian militants reduced the number of rockets to zero or single
digits from the Gaza Strip. Despite this relative security and calm,
Israel broke the cease-fire
to begin the notorious aerial and ground offensive that killed 1,400
Palestinians in twenty-two days. In November 2012, Israel’s
extrajudicial assassination of Ahmad Jabari,
the chief of Hamas’s military wing in Gaza, while he was reviewing
terms for a diplomatic solution, again broke the cease-fire that
precipitated the eight-day aerial offensive that killed 132
Palestinians.
Immediately preceding Israel’s most recent operation, Hamas rocket
and mortar attacks did not threaten Israel. Israel deliberately provoked this war
with Hamas. Without producing a shred of evidence, it accused the
political faction of kidnapping and murdering three settlers near
Hebron. Four weeks and almost 700 lives later, Israel has yet to produce
any evidence demonstrating Hamas’s involvement. During ten days of Operation Brother’s Keeper
in the West Bank, Israel arrested approximately 800 Palestinians
without charge or trial, killed nine civilians and raided nearly 1,300
residential, commercial and public buildings. Its military operation
targeted Hamas members released during the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange
in 2011. It’s these Israeli provocations that precipitated the Hamas
rocket fire to which Israel claims left it with no choice but a gruesome
military operation.
4) Israel avoids civilian casualties, but Hamas aims to kill civilians.
Hamas has crude weapons technology that lacks any targeting
capability. As such, Hamas rocket attacks ipso facto violate the
principle of distinction because all of its attacks are indiscriminate.
This is not contested. Israel, however, would not be any more tolerant
of Hamas if it strictly targeted military objects, as we have witnessed
of late. Israel considers Hamas and any form of its resistance, armed or
otherwise, to be illegitimate.
In contrast, Israel has the eleventh most powerful military in the
world, certainly the strongest by far in the Middle East, and is a
nuclear power that has not ratified the non-proliferation agreement and
has precise weapons technology. With the use of drones, F-16s and an
arsenal of modern weapon technology, Israel has the ability to target
single individuals and therefore to avoid civilian casualties. But
rather than avoid them, Israel has repeatedly targeted civilians as part
of its military operations.
The Dahiya Doctrine is central to these operations and refers to Israel’s indiscriminate attacks on Lebanon in 2006. Maj. Gen. Gadi Eizenkot said that this would be applied elsewhere:
What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006
will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on. […] We will
apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and
destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages,
they are military bases.
Israel has kept true to this promise. The 2009 UN Fact-Finding Mission to the Gaza Conflict, better known as the Goldstone Mission,
concluded “from a review of the facts on the ground that it witnessed
for itself that what was prescribed as the best strategy [Dahiya
Doctrine] appears to have been precisely what was put into practice.”
According to the National Lawyers Guild, Physicians for Human
Rights-Israel, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, Israel
directly targeted civilians or recklessly caused civilian deaths during
Operation Cast Lead. Far from avoiding the deaths of civilians, Israel
effectively considers them legitimate targets.
5) Hamas hides its weapons in homes, mosques and schools and uses human shields.
This is arguably one of Israel’s most insidious claims, because it
blames Palestinians for their own death and deprives them of even their
victimhood. Israel made the same argument in its war against Lebanon in 2006 and in its war against Palestinians in 2008. Notwithstanding its military cartoon sketches, Israel has yet to prove that Hamas has used civilian infrastructure to store military weapons. The two cases where Hamas indeed stored weapons in UNRWA schools, the schools were empty. UNRWA discovered the rockets and publicly condemned the violation of its sanctity.
International human rights organizations that have investigated these claims have determined that they are not true. It attributed the high death toll in Israel’s 2006 war on Lebanon to Israel’s indiscriminate attacks. Human Rights Watch notes:
The evidence Human Rights Watch uncovered in its
on-the-ground investigations refutes [Israel’s] argument…we found strong
evidence that Hezbollah stored most of its rockets in bunkers and
weapon storage facilities located in uninhabited fields and valleys,
that in the vast majority of cases Hezbollah fighters left populated
civilian areas as soon as the fighting started, and that Hezbollah fired
the vast majority of its rockets from pre-prepared positions outside
villages.
In fact, only Israeli soldiers
have systematically used Palestinians as human shields. Since Israel’s
incursion into the West Bank in 2002, it has used Palestinians as human
shields by tying young Palestinians onto the hoods of their cars or forcing them to go into a home where a potential militant may be hiding.
Even assuming that Israel’s claims were plausible, humanitarian law
obligates Israel to avoid civilian casualties that “would be excessive
in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.”
A belligerent force must verify whether civilian or civilian
infrastructure qualifies as a military objective. In the case of doubt,
“whether an object which is normally dedicated to civilian purposes,
such as a place of worship, a house or other dwelling or a school, is
being used to make an effective contribution to military action, it
shall be presumed not to be so used.”
In the over thee weeks of its military operation, Israel has
demolished 3,175 homes, at least a dozen with families inside; destroyed
five hospitals and six clinics; partially damaged sixty-four mosques
and two churches; partially to completely destroyed eight government
ministries; injured 4,620; and killed over 700 Palestinians. At plain
sight, these numbers indicate Israel’s egregious violations of
humanitarian law, ones that amount to war crimes.
Beyond the body count and reference to law, which is a product of
power, the question to ask is, What is Israel’s end goal? What if Hamas
and Islamic Jihad dug tunnels beneath the entirety of the Gaza
Strip—they clearly did not, but let us assume they did for the sake of
argument. According to Israel’s logic, all of Gaza’s 1.8 million
Palestinians are therefore human shields for being born Palestinian in
Gaza. The solution is to destroy the 360-kilometer square strip of land
and to expect a watching world to accept this catastrophic loss as
incidental. This is possible only by framing and accepting the
dehumanization of Palestinian life. Despite the absurdity of this
proposal, it is precisely what Israeli society is urging its military
leadership to do. Israel cannot bomb Palestinians into submission, and
it certainly cannot bomb them into peace.
I've never used the Crimes of Zion sites to publish work by other writers (there are two CoZ blogs and you're not on the original), but as you can see, I've been about as productive as tits on a bull for some time now as far as writing goes, and the article you're about to read is an exceptional piece that I feel deserves all the attention I can give it.
The author is, in my opinion, one of the best 9/11 researchers on the scene right now, and provided the quality of his work continues along its current trend and the output remains consistent, I'd even hazard a wager that in time, he'll come to be regarded as one of the foremost amateur (i.e. unpublished, internet-based) authorities on the explosive matter of 9/11/01. Spend a bit of time on his web site and you'll see what I mean. Work as good as this can only go unnoticed for so long.
As always, if you find this article helpful, share it. Facebook it, 'Tweet' it, e-mail it, link to it, throw it around, wherever and however you can.
Britain's Daily Mail carries
an
article on its website purporting to "finally prove once and for all that Building 7
was brought down by the intense heat of the blazing World Trade Center - and not
explosives, as conspiracy theorists claim". The newspaper's 'evidence' to
support its bold assertion consists of a two-minute video, which shows
fires burning on a couple of isolated floors in WTC7.
The footage has already been analyzed and described in detail in the
2008 NIST report on
WTC7: NIST NCSTAR 1-9. The NIST report shows a number of frames taken from the
footage. For example, Figure 5-143 is a frame from the video showing a close-up
of fires burning on the 8th floor on the NE corner. It was taken within a few minutes of 4:00 on
the afternoon of 9/11/01, about 1 hour 20 minutes before the building collapsed,
and nearly an hour before the BBC reported that it had collapsed. NIST has adjusted the intensities.
And Figure 5-138 corresponds to a frame around 0:15 in the video. The flame
height extends a little above the bottom of the window. NIST, in referring to
this image, describes the flames as "small flames burning on the window frames".
The Mail reporter has concocted a 'theory' of how
the fires were supposed to have brought down the building - the "exterior metal
beams" were "overheated" and began to "buckle", which "led to floors falling in
on one another, causing the building to collapse". The article asserts that
"you can even see the metal bars of the exterior buckling". However, those "exterior metal beams"
or "bars"
are simply aluminum window frames, and have nothing to do with holding up the
steel-framed building or
the floors.
The exterior columns were fireproofed 14-inch W-shapes (W14) fabricated from
ASTM A36 steel. There were 58 exterior columns (counting "14A") and 24 core
columns.
Even NIST did not try to pretend that columns heated significantly. They ran
simulations, which they termed "Case A", "Case B", and "Case C". In Case B they
increased Case A temperatures by 10%, and in Case C they decreased Case A temperatures
by 10%.
From 10.4 in their report:
The following is a list of findings common to the three Cases:
In none of the Cases did any of the columns, all of which were
insulated, reach temperatures sufficiently high for significant loss of
strength or stiffness.
The temperatures of Columns 79, 80, and 81 stayed below 200 °C on
all of the floors.
Only on Floors 12 and 13 did any of the exterior column temperatures
exceed 150 °C.
On these floors, the temperatures on the east and south
exterior columns reached 300 °C.
The video shows fires burning on the 8th floor, and NIST admits that the exterior columns on that floor did not exceed 150
°C. A temperature of 150 °C is not going to induce buckling in steel columns.
Early Google captures confirm that the Mail's article originally included the
reporter's name, Meghan Keneally. After the article came in for a lot of stick, being
variously condemned in the earlier comments as "rubbish", "utterly pathetic", "disappointing", "official
propaganda", and "the stupidest article of dis-information", and
elsewhere described as looking "like it was written by a child for a school
essay", the attribution was hastily deleted
and revised to "DAILY MAIL REPORTER".
It can also been seen that the unsustainable lie about the video being
"unseen" footage was changed to "rare" footage. Yeah, right. Rare enough for
multiple frames extracted from it to be all over the NIST report and seen by
millions of people over the past three years.
Ms. Keneally is an American-born freelance
journalist and dual U.S. - British citizen who alternates between Manhattan and
London. Her bio and résumé show
that she received a "Master’s degree at
Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism" - a "Master of
Science", inter alia. Thus, Ms. Keneally is not simply too gormless and scientifically illiterate to understand how the fact that
various elements have various melting points, along with forensic evidence that
indicates the temperatures attained in some particular incident, especially when
corroborated by the presence of accelerants that will produce such temperatures,
tells us whether or not accelerants were employed by criminals with access to
the buildings involved in the incident in question. In this case, it was to ensure
that the buildings collapsed to provide the casus belli they required for their
wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and possibly Iran.
However, years of brainwashing that induces an inverted world-view in which conspiracy facts
are perceived as conspiracy theories and vice versa, along with a
clear
understanding that a failure to support the official line on events like 9/11
would be career suicide, leads to otherwise intelligent journalists posting
"rubbish" and "dis-information" that "comes across like it
was written by a child for a school essay". And to be fair, journalists
have deadlines to meet, and do not have the luxury of being able to spend weeks
on an article after having already researched the subject in their spare time over most of the
previous decade.
There is
irrefutable
evidence showing
that conspiracy theories such as "the Arabs did 9/11" and "Hani Hanjour flew
Flight 77 into the Pentagon" are nothing more than a legend fabricated to go
with a false-flag terror operation that was conceived and orchestrated for political and business purposes, and touted
for public consumption by the true perpetrators and their agents. As to why some
people choose to live in denial and cling to such theories despite their
implausibility, this question is best
answered by psychologists such as those
featured on the Architects &
Engineers for 9/11 Truth video 9/11: Explosive Evidence, Experts Speak Out,
or by Laurie Manwell at the Toronto Hearings.
It took NIST until 2008 to come up with their "thermal expansion" theory
of collapse. That was after early attempts at implicating diesel fuel came
apart at the seams, when it was found
that the evidence against the diesel fuel hypothesis was too overwhelming for it to be
advocated even by government scientists.
But the "thermal expansion" theory not only fails to account for the presence of active thermitic
material and evidence of extremely high temperatures; it
even fails to account for collapse of the building.
At 400 °C, the temperature required to retain rigidity, thermal expansion
of a 52-ft floor beam would have been 3.3 inches; less than the required 5.5 inches
for the connection to "walk off" its seat. Even at 600 °C, the
expansion of the beam would be no more than 0.000014 x (600 - 25) x (52 x 12) =
5.0 inches.
Combustibles at any given location would be fully consumed within about
twenty minutes, so it is unrealistic to imagine that a beam insulated with
Monokote MK-5 would be heated to 600 °C along the whole of its length at any
given time. In any case, even NIST
admitted in 2004 that the fire on Floor 12,
below the girder between columns 79 and 44 under Floor 13 that was supposed to
have failed at 5:20 p.m. initiating a total collapse, was burned out by 4:45 p.m. In fact, the east end fire
there had burned out before 4:00 p.m. And it is ludicrous to suppose that failure of a single
column in a high-rise would be so catastrophic an event as to induce global collapse of
the building in the manner of a controlled demolition, with the symmetrical
failure of 400 steel connections per second. Buildings of 47 or 110 stories are
over-engineered to ensure they don't collapse from office fires or from a single
column failure.
Moreover, the explicit testimony of
Barry
Jennings, an eyewitness who
told of how he was trapped in WTC7 by early explosions prior to the collapse of
either Tower, directly contradicts the official theory as touted by NIST
that fires in WTC7 led to its collapse after being ignited during the collapse
of the Twin Towers. Sadly, Mr. Jennings died on August 19, 2008, just two days before NIST released the draft version of its WTC7 report.
The 'coincidental' timing of NIST's draft release is consistent with NIST
delaying publication until receiving confirmation of the death.
NIST postulating its
"thermal expansion" collapse theory is analogous to a corrupt
policeman who dismisses bullets
and bullet wounds found in a corpse, pretends they are not there, and
reports that the death was a result of being hit on the head by a piece of
paper.
Apart from Meghan Keneally's apparent blunder in confusing window
panes
with exterior columns, and attempt to outdo NIST in proposing a collapse
theory
in seven minutes when it took them seven years to do the same, she has
advanced one of the biggest straw man arguments of all time. No one
claims that there were never any fires burning in WTC7. There has always
been
evidence of office fires at WTC1, 2 and 7, and a confirmation of that is
not
news and will not cause anyone to change their mind.
Analysis of dust samples obtained from the vicinity of the World Trade Center,
one of them from the Manhattan side of the Brooklyn Bridge "about ten minutes
after the fall of the North Tower" and thereby eliminating any possibility of
contamination from the clean-up, showed that active thermitic material
was ubiquitous in the dense dust that settled over Manhattan following the
collapses of the Twin Towers. The dust contained an abundance
of iron spheres and distinctive red-gray chips comprised of 40 nm-thick aluminum plates and
100 nm iron oxide grains embedded in a silicon-carbon matrix. Tests using a
differential scanning calorimeter determined that the energy release of the red-gray chips
was up to 7 kJ/g. Although reality
deniers unable to handle the truth and others attempting to cover for the 9/11
perpetrators lied by claiming that the material was "primer paint", that is
robustly refuted by the facts.
Unlike primer paint, these chips did not
dissolve after 55 hours in MEK paint solvent with agitation, had a
low electrical resistance of ~ 10 ohms per meter, contained no zinc, magnesium
or chromium, and ignited at ~ 430 C to form iron-rich spherules, indicative of a
thermitic reaction yielding a molten iron product.
In contrast to the "office fires" hypothesis, the existence of tons of active thermitic material capable of
yielding iron- or steel-melting temperatures in a reaction that generates its
own source of pure oxygen from the reduction of iron oxide, with some of the
material nano-sized
and igniting at around 430 °C, could account for the collapses and the observed
phenomena before and after collapse. Thermitic material has a lower calorific value
than combustibles such as kerosene or wood, but those produce much lower
temperatures when burning in air because oxygen is inextricably mixed with at least 3.77 times as much nitrogen
and argon, which must be heated in the reaction before heat can be transmitted to the
surroundings, e.g. to steel members. The transmission of energy away from the
hot gases lowers the flame temperature from its adiabatic value, commensurate
with the proportion of energy that is transmitted. In the WTC fires some 40%
(one-third to one-half according to FEMA) of the energy released was vented out to
drive the smoke plume. Oxides of nitrogen are not formed at the temperatures
found in office fires, and in any case, most nitrogen oxides have a positive
heat of formation (compared to zero for the elements such as N2),
which means that oxidation of nitrogen is not an exothermic (heat-releasing)
reaction. If it were, the world would be a very dangerous place indeed.
The evidence for molten and even vaporized metals is the Achilles heel of the
official story.
Although the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal paper on active thermitic material
was peer-reviewed - notwithstanding
fallacious lies by scientifically illiterate so-called "debunkers", NIST amusingly
shies away from peer-review of its own work. NIST refuses to provide details of the
input parameters for its computer models of the WTC7 fires, on the grounds that
such release would "jeopardize public safety".
The Mail article says that a failure to believe the official line of "Al
Qaeda terrorists" carrying out the 9/11 attacks amounts to "wild claims".
However, "wild claims" rarely gain the support of structural engineers,
architects, physicists, mechanical engineers, metallurgical engineering
graduates, PhD scientists, fire protection engineers, fire-fighters, electrical
design engineers, explosives technicians, psychologists, international judges,
etc. There is one exception: in the case of a carefully-planned operation to
brainwash the public by a global crime syndicate that has taken control of the
mainstream media, banking, and has political leaders under its thumb. Then,
almost everyone will initially believe the Stalinesque revision of
events, but over the ensuing years an ever-increasing group of people will
realise that they've been lied to. Those who take the longest to learn do
so not necessarily because they are stupid, but because they tend to work for
government or government agencies, or they are very trusting of government. They
perceive it as a benevolent institution, and they refuse to believe that
presidents and prime ministers could be psychopathic puppets in the hands of an
evil Mafia. Such people have a crippled epistemology, since they obtain their
information from a limited range of sources (e.g. the mainstream media), and
their prejudices prevent them from conducting a critical analysis of multiple
sources.
Here's the comment that the writer originally submitted to the Mail's page:
Electron microprobe (WDS) analysis of solidified slag found in the WTC debris
pile determined an abundance of iron but very little aluminum. Analysis of the
WTC dust found it to contain 5.87% iron spheres by mass - which is 150 times
higher than in dust samples from typical office buildings - and red-gray chips.
A study of these chips, described in an April 2009 25-page peer-reviewed paper
that has never been refuted, concluded they were a nano-engineered, unreacted
thermitic material comprised of 40 nm-thick aluminum plates and 100 nm iron
oxide grains embedded in a silicon-carbon matrix. Unlike primer paint, these
chips did not dissolve after 55 hours in MEK paint solvent with agitation, had a
low electrical resistance of ~ 10 ohms per meter, contained no zinc, magnesium
or chromium, and ignited at ~ 430 C to form iron-rich spherules, indicative of a
thermitic reaction yielding a molten iron product. Fireproofed steel members
from WTC7 were found to have partially evaporated.
The form field indicates that postings of up to a 1,000 character limit are
accepted, and this is confirmed by comments that have appeared and are very
close to this limit. There is also a statement that "the comments below have not
been moderated".
Source:
DailyMail.co.uk
After submission the post did not appear, so the next attempt involved splitting it up into two, and changing
"solidified slag" to "previously molten metal" in case their computer thought
"slag" was an abusive reference to a woman. Following that second attempt, the
comments did show up. After a poster
using the name "sara goldstein" declared that "conspiracy theorists are sooo
stupid" and claimed that the heat of a "bonfire" would be "clearly hot enough to
collapse an [sic] building", another post was prepared and broken up into three
parts, such that each was well within the character limit:
For those who complain that opponents of the official 9/11 story just "cry
about melted steel and stuff", I'll explain the significance. The laws of
probability, thermodynamics and thermochemistry dictate that military-grade
unreacted nano-thermite does not form spontaneously, and office fires of
hydrocarbons burning in air of up to 21% oxygen cannot melt iron or steel. The
time evolution of a spontaneous process will be in the direction of increasing
entropy; thus, a sophisticated, highly energetic, nano-engineered accelerant
comprising 40 nm-thick aluminum plates and 100 nm iron oxide grains requires a
'creator' - e.g., the U.S. or Israeli military.
It's all very well saying fires are "hot", but an exothermic reaction
(combustion) only releases energy equal to the difference in heats of formation
of the reactants and the products. Office fires must heat the 79% nitrogen
inherent in air, which is intimately part of the mix. Heat does not flow from
cooler to warmer zones unless work is performed by an external agent, e.g. as in
a refrigerator. Thus, the heat released of 13.1 kJ/g of oxygen consumed - or
less in a fuel-rich, oxygen-depleted, black smoke-generating office fire -
produces gas temperatures below the melting points of iron and steel after heat
is transmitted from the gaseous product to the environment such as steel
members. These can approach, but never reach or exceed, the gas temperatures.
On the other hand, the thermitic reaction produces iron-melting temperatures
of ~ 2,500 C because the aluminum burns with pure oxygen that has been taken
from the iron oxide. Molten elemental iron is actually one of the products. This
is why the National Fire Protection Association NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and
Explosion Investigations (19.2.4, 2001 Edition) points out that melted steel or
concrete is a sign of exotic accelerants such as thermite. Reams and literally
tons of multiple, corroborating evidence proves beyond doubt that WTC1, 2 and 7
were taken down in controlled demolitions and, by extension, the Arabs were 9/11
patsies not perpetrators.
The first attempt at posting the first section was unsuccessful. Hours later,
in a second attempt, the suspected sources for the nano-thermite were revised
from "the
U.S. or Israeli military" to "the U.S. military". Pass! The comment was accepted
this time. So apparently the Mail's computer deems "Israeli" to be a dirty word
- at least, in any discussion about 9/11.
The second part did not appear. In case they had set their
filter to censor discussion of "Israeli agents", the word "agent"
was changed to
"device" and resubmitted, but to no avail.
It's no
surprise that the Mail's Managing Director (since 1994) is Guy Zitter, a
"British" Jew
with a BSc in commerce, who was a senior Finance Officer for the Seychelles government
and
used to run a nightclub there.
As will be demonstrated below, newspapers run by Zionist Jews have a powerful motive
to mislead the public regarding the events of 9/11/01. Given that Daily Mail
writers include Zionist Jew Melanie Phillips who peddles the official story about "al Qaeda" and even posted speculative nonsense about Iranian involvement in 9/11
now that Zionist warmongers have set their sights on Iran, and the rabidly Zionist Richard
Littlejohn who draws readers in with his 'humor' and then sells them a bunch of
bull about a "war [that] the Islamonazis have declared on our
civilisation", the evidence points towards Guy Zitter
being a Zionist Jew.
Proof of Israel's central role in 9/11
It is proven beyond the slightest shadow of doubt that
Israeli agents had foreknowledge of 9/11, and together with scientific forensic proof of
controlled demolitions of WTC1, 2 and 7 along with the sheer implausibility of
many elements of the official account such as Hani Hanjour flying a Boeing 757
into the first floor of the Pentagon at 530 mph with the engines clearing the
lawn by a couple of feet, this wasn't simply a case of LIHOP. It wasn't merely a
question of Zionists who were aware of a Muslim aircraft hijacking plot yet
purposely let it happen. It was MIHOP: criminal Zionist Jews planned and
orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. They made it happen on purpose and made damn sure
that the Twin Towers collapsed killing thousands of people, so that Israel's
so-called "allies" would be sufficiently outraged to wage war on Israel's foes.
See The "Dancing Israelis" FBI Report - Debunked
for full analysis and links to sources.
In late September 2001,
a large-scale 37-nation poll of world opinion carried out by Gallup
International found Mexico to be more opposed to the Afghanistan war than almost
any other - if not any other - nation, with 94% of Mexicans favoring a legal
response in the form of extradition and trial, rather than military action. A
couple weeks later, Mossad agent Salvador Guersson Smecke and Israeli illegal
immigrant Saur Ben Zvi were caught red-handed and
arrested inside the Mexican
Congress chamber in possession of
guns, grenades,
dynamite, detonators and wiring while posing as "press photographers". That
failed false-flag operation, on
October 10, 2001,
was aimed at boosting
Mexican support
for the war, a mere three days
into the invasion.
The very first people arrested on suspicion of involvement in the 9/11 attacks
turned out to be five Israeli Jews: Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg (Sivan's
brother), Oded Ellner, Yaron Shmuel and Omer Marmari. Their white Urban Moving
Systems van was stopped and they were arrested within hours of the attacks, on
the afternoon of 9/11/01. Sivan Kurzberg, Ellner and Shmuel had been observed by
several eyewitnesses at the rear parking lot of the Doric apartment complex in
Union City, New Jersey. They were seen atop the van with cameras, high-fiving,
smiling, joking with cries of joy and mockery, hugging each other, and taking
photographs and video of the Twin Towers within a few minutes of the first plane
impact.
In fact, they were seen filming atop the van before the local news radio
station 1010 WINS had even broken the news of the first plane crash. The station
actually had one of its sales team account executives on her cell phone to its
newsroom before the first plane crashed after she noticed it was too low
and was going to crash, and so were quickly able to patch her on air to provide
a live report. When seen, Ellner was kneeling at the back of the van facing New
York City with his camera and Kurzberg and Shmuel were facing him. After their
film was developed and processed by the FBI, the photographs depicted all three
Israelis visibly smiling. In one photo, Kurzberg could be seen flicking a
lighter like he was at a rock concert as the North Tower burned in the
background. This jovial celebration was taking place before the second impact,
when innocent bystanders believed the incident was merely a tragic accident.
When arrested, the Israelis - dubbed the "High-Fivers" by the FBI - were
found to have airline tickets with immediate travel dates for destinations
world-wide, and tie-ins to 9/11.
Early reports said that these "tie-ins" were "maps of the city" with
"certain places
highlighted" linking the Israelis to the "bombing plot". Carl Cameron's subsequent Fox News report
of
12/12/01 told of a "highly placed investigator" who admitted that there were tie-ins,
but refused to provide details. The investigator stated,
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified, I cannot tell you about
evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information." In other words,
there is evidence linking them, but the investigator can't confirm the early
reports regarding maps because Israel is
too high in the pecking order.
Marc Perelman of New York's Jewish weekly The Forward reported on
March 15, 2002 that the FBI had concluded that
at least two of the Israelis were
agents working for the Mossad,
and their employer Urban
Moving Systems Incorporated was a suspected intelligence front. On
September 14, 2001, Urban's owner
Dominick Suter
fled the U.S.
for
Israel. Perelman also
tells on video of how he was able to
confirm that, according to the FBI, two of the five Israelis were "Mossad
agents". Christopher Ketcham says the transcripts of the Carl Cameron
report were later
removed from the Fox News website following pressure from Abe Foxman of the ADL,
and replaced with the rather Orwellian message: "This story no longer exists".
The FBI documents on the five Israelis were heavily redacted before
release, with the more politically sensitive parts blanked out and classified
until 2030 or 2035. Nevertheless,
the information retained shows that Paul Kurzberg worked for the Jewish
Agency, and his brother Sivan's job in Israel had involved hunting Arabs of whom the Zionist
regime did not approve. The FBI documents also show how the NS-2C Unit of its "National Security
Division" from FBI Headquarters, Washington, D.C., in a communication dated
09/24/2001, ordered FBI-Newark to call off its investigation of the Israelis and to
"assist US Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in any INS proceedings
for the five Israeli Nationals in detention at the Federal Bureau of Prisons,
Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York". Dual US-Israeli citizen
Michael Chertoff,
who co-authored the USA Patriot Act" and headed the Justice Department's Criminal
Division in the aftermath of 9/11, is a prime suspect for pulling strings to get the Israelis
released and sent home.
All three Israelis lied, providing conflicting alibis of how they came to be
seen at the Doric parking lot within such a short time of the first plane crash.
Their alibis were physically impossible, given the time available for one of them
to receive a telephone call from a friend alerting him to the news of a plane
crash, then to read about the event on the Israeli news site YNET.co.il and the
U.S. site CNN.com on two of their moving company's sixteen computers,
then for the three of them to make the bizarre decision that it would be worth
leaving their workplace - and risk the wrath of their boss who was "tight with
money" and normally did not let his employees take his vans for personal use -
to "document" for "history" a simple plane crash that no innocent person could
have known would turn out to be the defining event of the turn of the century,
to gather up their cameras which they luckily had with them at work that day and run out
to their employer's van, to drive through rush hour traffic on what is normally
a four to five-minute journey as they thought of a suitable location on the fly,
make a left turn into an apartment block and drive around to the rear parking
lot, get out and climb onto the roof of the van with their cameras, ending up at
a location where one of them (Sivan Kurzberg) had been sighted the
previous day posing as a "construction worker", all of this having to occur
within a few minutes before the local news radio station had broken the news of
the first plane crash. In
their first alibis, Shmuel claimed they were on the West Side Highway in New
York City at the time of the "incident", Kurzberg said they first
climbed onto the Urban
Moving Systems roof and were then stuck in heavy traffic before arriving
at Doric, and Ellner claimed they stopped at a Gulf gas station on the way to
Doric after hearing of the first plane crash. Ellner's new, improved alibi was
the variation in which he received a telephone call from a friend alerting him
to the first plane crash, and two of the Israelis then spent "a few minutes" reading about the event
on CNN.com and YNET.co.il before setting off to Doric.
In the real world, as opposed to some fantasy dreamed up by tinfoil
conspiracy
kooks or concocted by inveterate liars about nineteen Arabs with box
cutters, events occur in a certain well-defined order that all observers
can agree
on, unless they are traveling at relativistic velocities or someone has
invented
a way of bending the local space-time manifold. Websites such as CNN.com
did not
carry the news until after 8:49:34, and the first reports were of a fire, not a
plane crash. Traffic to news sites was so heavy that many servers collapsed.
CNN.com and the
Israeli news site YNET.co.il did not have news posted
about the first plane crash at a time such that several Israelis could browse
the internet and read about it on Urban Moving's computers for a "few minutes"
(which would imply that there was already so much detail about the event on news
sites that it must have been long after the first impact), then go on a four or
five-minute journey through rush-hour traffic, make a left turn and drive around
to a parking lot at the back of an apartment complex, jump out and climb onto
the top of the van and turn on their cameras, all before the local AM news
radio station 1010 WINS was able to broadcast its breaking news report from a WINS account
executive who was on scene and actually on her cell phone to the WINS newsroom
before the
first plane crashed. And all in the time it takes for a Doric apartment resident
to be prompted to look out of the window by the sound of the impact or explosion
as the first plane slammed into the North Tower at approximately 8:46:30 a.m.,
to scan the area for a minute or two before observing the smoke from the WTC,
then to "immediately" telephone her friend, and for her friend to grab her
binoculars and look out of the window and see the three Israelis atop the van. No
browsing the internet, leaving work to go on a drive through rush-hour traffic,
or climbing onto the roof of a van required.
And all in the time it takes another eyewitness at Doric to notice the disaster,
to walk along to an apartment to inform his colleague within five minutes of the
first impact, and for the colleague to stand up from painting the baseboard and
look out of the window to see the three Israelis atop the van.
The Doric location afforded an excellent view of both the
North and South Towers across the Hudson River in New York City, and was an
ideal location for recording video footage of planes approaching each Tower -
one from the north and one from the south. In contrast, the Urban Moving Systems
office and warehouse was north of the World Trade Center, and although it provided a view
of the top of the North Tower, it would have been a lousy choice for anyone
planning to "document" an event that included a plane approaching from the south
to crash into the South Tower. Moreover, the Israelis quickly left the parking
lot after the second plane crash, which would be puzzling behavior for wannabe
journalists who'd just seen two plane crashes and were not to know there
wouldn't be a third. At the time they were seen celebrating the first
plane crash they were not out on a delivery or collection as part of their job. Oded Ellner
later said on Israeli TV that their purpose was to
"document the event".
No evidence for the "nineteen Arabs with box cutters"
tinfoil conspiracy theory
There is no
credible evidence that Arab "hijackers" were on any of the four 9/11 planes.
Mossad agents posing as "art students" - agents of the true 9/11 perpetrators - had
been concentrated around the Hollywood, Florida area, which is where 15 of the 19
alleged hijackers were living in June 2001.
A third
principal was Hanan Serfaty (or Sarfati), a team leader residing in Hollywood,
Florida. When questioned by the DEA in Tampa, Florida, on March 1, 2001, he had
in his possession bank deposit slips amounting to more than $100,000 from
December 2000 through the first quarter of 2001, and withdrawal slips for
slightly less than that amount during the period. Mr. Serfaty served in the
Israeli military between the ages of 18 and 21, but refused to disclose to the
DEA his activities between the ages of 21 and 24, including his activities since
his U.S. arrival at age 23 in 2000.14 Another was Peer Segalovitz of Tamarac,
Florida (about 20 miles west of Hollywood—see MAP 1), an active officer in an
Israeli special forces battalion who commanded 80 men in the Golan Heights. He
was detained in Orlando on May 3, 2001.
Shea continues:
...in June 2001, just two or three months before the
September 11 hijackings, 15 of the 19 future hijackers were also living in
Hollywood, nine in the town itself and six in surrounding towns (see Exhibit B
and MAPS 1 and 2). Hollywood, for months, had been and would continue to be the
staging ground for the hijacking of the World Trade Center Planes and the
Pennsylvania Plane. Among the Israeli groups, more than 30 lived in the
Hollywood area, 10 in Hollywood itself.
Map 1 in the memorandum covers the Hollywood, Florida area.
Anyone believing the official version of events should have been asking what
the hell were so many Israeli spies doing in the U.S., supposedly an "ally" of
Israel, which is a country the size of New Jersey. After all, Israel's enemies are supposed to be the Palestinians
and neighboring Arab states. Any
Palestinian "terrorist" who wanted to blow up Israelis would simply go ahead and
do so, not go traveling around the globe and training for months or years to become a pilot. And if
the Mossad were so hot on tracking Arab terrorists and there really had been an
"Arab" plot to crash planes into the World Trade Center, then they should have
provided a public warning so that everyone could have been evacuated. Of course,
the Mossad did warn some people. The
two hours' advance
warning of an attack on the WTC transmitted through Odigo, the Israeli
instant messaging company with offices in Herzliya and New York, was probably sent to some individuals at the
level of vice-president or above. Larry Silverstein was well aware that he and his
children could not turn up for work at the WTC on the morning of 9/11.
An important part of these Mossad agents' job was to craft the "Arabs did 9/11" legend by stealing passports and
finding Arabs to frame, for example by carefully observing the movements of
Saudi Airlines flight engineers who'd been sent to Florida for pilot training
because the airline was eliminating flight engineers from its three-member
crews. The program had ended for some of the engineers shortly before 9/11,
which is why they were leaving the Vero Beach, Florida area
around that time.
Problem was, it meant that many of the "dead hijackers" would turn up alive
and indignant, probably in Saudi Arabia, and those pushing the legend would have to
resort to claiming it
was just lots of cases of mistaken identity.
A good exposition of the frame-up and the evolving list of hijackers' names can
be found in Paul Zarembka's The Hidden History of 9-11.
If
Satam al-Suqami, Waleed al-Shehri and Wail al-Shehri had been on the flight manifests, the authorities would not have initially
claimed Adnan Bukhari, Ameer Bukhari and Amer Kamfar as hijackers in their place. Adnan was found to be
alive and living in Florida. Ameer
died in a small plane crash on September 11, 2000 - exactly one year too
early. On September 14, 2001, Kamfar was reported as being possibly alive and "armed with an AK-47",
and then he turned out to be alive and innocent and living in Mecca: one of
those flight engineer / pilots who'd been recalled from Vero Beach to Saudi
Arabia. And given that Ameer Bukhari had been dead for a year and Adnan Bukhari
was not a hijacker, the claim that their names were on paperwork relating to a
rented 2001 silver-blue Nissan Altima found at Portland International Jetport,
Maine,
was a lie. The alternative is a story that makes no sense: that Atta rented a Mitsubishi sedan in
his real name, then bizarrely abandoned the Mitsubishi at Boston's Logan Airport and
inexplicably rented a Nissan using identities stolen from the Bukharis to travel to
Portland with Alomari on a journey that meant they would risk missing their connecting flight
with the consequent failure of their mission.
Of course, the Portland diversion was a necessary part of the legend because
this was the only video footage the authorities had of any of the "hijackers" at
an airport within days of 9/11. The grainy "surveillance video" that lacked a
time stamp, purportedly of "hijackers" at Washington Dulles, was not released
until July 2004. And they also had images of Atta and Alomari at a Portland ATM
in which their faces were clear enough for a positive
identification. The Portland narrative provided the opportunity for Atta's baggage to be 'found'
with lots of incriminating 'evidence'
after the baggage supposedly missed Atta's final flight, as if a suicide pilot
would choose to take their last will and testament with them on a plane that they were
planning to crash into a skyscraper, rather than leave it some place where it
would certainly be found (or destroy it instead, if they didn't want it to be
found).
For anyone in need of "Saudi suicide pilots" to frame as patsies, the
deceased pilot Ameer Bukhari, a Saudi Arabian national of Vero Beach, Florida,
would have been an ideal choice provided they could keep the lid on the fact
that he had died in the "wrong" year. The "Alomari" hijacker was
originally
Abdul Rahman Alomari, a pilot, friend and neighbor of Adnan Bukhari. When
Alomari was found to be alive, as was Adnan Bukhari, the hijacker was claimed to be Abdulaziz Alomari. Problem is, he
turned up alive too, although his name and birth date
matched that of the FBI's "terrorist". And he's never been a pilot.
His passport
was stolen when his apartment in Denver, Colorado, was burgled in 1995.
Daniel Mark Lewin, an
Israeli-"American" Zionist Jew who was briefly a billionaire at the
height of the dot-com boom in 1999, is said to have been on Flight 11. Lewin, in common with Benjamin
Netanyahu who declared on separate occasions that 9/11 was "very good"
and beneficial for Israel, served in the clandestine IDF special forces unit
Sayeret Matkal, is an alumnus of MIT, and was part raised in the U.S. and
part raised in Jerusalem. Sayeret Matkal was a part of Aman
(military intelligence "unit 154"), and many of its members were originally Aman
"mista'arvim" - experts at disguising themselves as Arabs.
In an interesting 'coincidence', Lewin and Abdulaziz Alomari were both claimed to
have been on Flight 11, and Lewin was a native of Denver, which is where one of
the "wrong" Alomaris had his passport stolen.
Another remarkable 'coincidence' is
that one alleged hijacker - Ziad al-Jarrah - was
the cousin of Ali al-Jarrah, who happened to have been working from 1983 to
2008 as an Israeli intelligence asset. Ali's brother Yusuf is also understood to
have helped Ali betray his compatriots by spying for Israel. Ali al-Jarrah
received more than $300,000 for his "work" from Israel. The New York Times
claimed that the two cousins did not "appear" to have known each other "well", a
tacit admission that they did know each other. The most likely explanation for
this 'coincidence' is that Ziad al-Jarrah was also an Israeli intelligence asset
who had been
recruited by his older cousin.
There is multiple corroborating evidence that
Muslims did not do
9/11, and that Israel played a
central role, aided by
corrupt elements of the Bush
administration. This is reinforced by Zionist Jews' role in the cover-up:
Jerome Hauer's
appearance on TV within hours of the attacks peddling the official story about "Osama bin Laden" and
buildings that collapsed because of plane impacts and intense fires, the
Herzliya-based Don Radlauer's publication of a report
detailing the flight paths of the alleged four hijacked planes that suggested
hijacking and steering the planes would have been an easy task, Eddie Guigui
Shalev's claim
that Hani Hanjour was a "good" pilot, and Bernard Kerik's receipt of more
than $236,000 (as "rent") from Steven C. Witkoff along with a $250,000 "loan"
originating
from
Eitan Wertheimer, after Kerik had traveled to Israel two weeks prior to
9/11/01 where he met Wertheimer, and then
claimed on 9/16/01 that a "hijacker's passport" had been "discovered"
- implying that it had miraculously got separated from the "hijacker's" clothing or
baggage and another hundred tons of aircraft debris, survived the Flight 11 fireball, and floated down to the ground in
almost pristine condition despite being soaked with jet fuel.
Wertheimer - whose
father Stef helped to make weapons for Jewish terrorists before 1948, and whose
family was listed by Forbes magazine as fourth-richest in Israel as of March
2011 with a net worth of $4 billion -
was reading the
infamous Popular Mechanics at the age of 4. In its March 2005 edition, Popular
Mechanics ran a dishonest piece purporting to be "debunking the myths" of
"9/11 conspiracy theories". They did not even make a half-hearted attempt to
'explain' forensic evidence such as molten steel at the WTC by, for example,
pretending it was aluminum or lead. They just totally ignored it, dodging the
issue with the non sequitur that the "steel
frames didn't need to melt" in order
for the buildings to collapse, and then attacked straw man claims, e.g. about
video 'evidence' of a
"pod" on Flight 175.
Others attempting to
cover for their crooked co-religionists include Cass Sunstein and David Aaronovitch,
the former trying to
counter 9/11 truth by infiltration, and the latter by mixing in lots of straw
men, denying evidence that he finds inconvenient and bringing out the old
chestnut about how it would have needed a lot of conspirators. In other words,
Aaronovitch and Popular Mechanics employ a similar sophistry.
Ironically, journalists who attempt to defend the official 9/11 legend are
actually benefitting the truth movement when they bring attention to Building 7, or when
their shaky assertions serve to highlight the inadequacies of the legend. Of
course, Meghan Keneally's article could have been designed to help 9/11 truth
whilst duping the Mail's bosses into thinking it was anti-truth.
Given that a mainstream journalist
attempting to submit unequivocally pro-truth articles would risk being fired and would not
expect to see their work published, journalists should
research 9/11 privately, and then discuss it with like-minded colleagues until an overwhelming majority have learnt the
truth and are in a position to stand up to their crooked bosses. Otherwise,
how can any objective, unbiased reporting be expected from the mainstream
media on a matter as
important as 9/11, as long as it is run by
Asiatic
Mongoloidwar-loving,
money-grubbing, truth-hating, amoralNeanderthals, chancers, hedonists and
infiltrators whose loyalty
is to none other than atheisticself-styled "Jews" and the Mishpucka?
Why those who say 9/11 was a Zionist job are not
"anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists"
Those who are relatively new to the issues of false-flag
terrorism, Zionism and the New World Order may be asking themselves if
suggestions that Israel did 9/11 is a "conspiracy theory" or is "anti-Semitic".
That disinformation has been disseminated by the 9/11 perpetrators, who love to
exploit it as a means of deflecting attention from themselves, their crimes and
deceptions. Any hypothesis about a crime committed by two or more people is a
conspiracy theory. However, the 9/11 conspiracy theory of "nineteen Arabs with
box cutters" is (almost) the most ridiculous of all conspiracy theories, since
the evidence totally refutes it. The perpetrators deliberately float even
crazier theories such as "aluminum planes could not have penetrated the WTC" and
"WTC was hit by hologram missiles that look like planes". They are aware that
the official legend will look quite reasonable in comparison, and 9/11 truth will be
tarnished by association with garbage such as "no planes at the WTC", "space
beam weapons destroyed the WTC", and "nukes
destroyed the WTC".
The 'evidence' that is supposed to support the official conspiracy theory is
planted, fake evidence, such as a "hijacker's passport" that was "discovered",
or an
"Osama confession" video that was conveniently "found"
amongst all the
buildings in Jalalabad (population estimated at
roughly 250,000 as of 1999) in occupied Afghanistan within 5 weeks of it
allegedly having been made, in which the only similarities between the
"confessor" and OBL are that both of them wore a turban and sported a beard. Or
"Osama" audiotapes, when they found it too embarrassing to bring out the same
old photo each time. And that was long after the real
Osama bin Laden had
denied
responsibility for the attacks. Twice, that is, even helpfully
suggesting some
possible suspects the second time. The evidence proving the official theory
to be false is conspiracy fact, including ten years of hard science in which the
material evidence now includes not only molten iron and evidence of extremely
high temperatures (the "smoking gun"), but also active thermitic material (the
"loaded gun"). Israelis with proven foreknowledge, a top Zionist Jew with access
to the best Flight Termination System for electronically hijacking aircraft via
a Command Transmitter System, an Israeli Instant Messaging service through which
two hours' advance knowledge of an attack on the World Trade Center was
transmitted, and Jews who were friends with four Israeli prime ministers and who
took control of the WTC lease, and
insured the buildings
against terror attacks for billions of dollars, six weeks before the
buildings were destroyed in terror attacks, not forgetting to insert a clause
stating that in the event of a terrorist attack the partners could
not only collect the insured value of the property, but
would also be released from all of their obligations under the 99-year lease. See
9/11 For Reality
Deniers for more.
As for accusations of anti-Semitism, it just so happens that Jewish criminals
are at the top of the food chain, and all the credible evidence - as opposed to
fake evidence such as planted passports and Korans, phony videos and
"confessions" extracted following waterboarding - demonstrates that Jews,
not Muslims,
masterminded the 9/11 attacks.
Jews comprise nearly 0.2% of the world population.
The North American Jewish Data Bank provides details of a study that places
the total Jewish population at 13,428,300 at the beginning of 2010. The
Jewish Virtual Library has a more concise presentation
with a useful set of tables that shows population by
country. These sources state that the total human population was 6.900 billion
as of 2010. So the
probability of any given individual being Jewish is about 1 in 514. As of
September 2011, the population of Israel was 7,797,400, and of those some
5,874,300 were Jewish. The world population was almost 7 billion by then, and so
Israelis constitute 1 in 898 of the population, with Israeli Jews making up a 1
in 1,192 proportion. As will be shown below, those behind 9/11 were not only
Jews and were not only Zionist Jews, they were rabidly Zionist
Jews and so part of a much smaller group.
So we have the five Israeli Jews arrested on the afternoon of 9/11 after
three of them were seen filming and celebrating almost immediately after the
first plane impact. The FBI concluded that two of the five - most likely Paul and Sivan Kurzberg - were Mossad agents.
Even allowing for many thousands of sayanim, these agents are part of a much
smaller set than Israeli Jews.
Then we have Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who as the former
CEO of SPC International
had access to world-leading aircraft remote control technology incorporating a "Flight
Termination System" capable of simultaneously taking over a number of
in-flight aircraft and issuing commands via a "Command
Transmitter System". Zakheim was at SPC on October 31, 1999, around the
time when the 9/11
planners would have wanted to carry out a trial run of electronically hijacking
a
Boeing aircraft. On that date, EgyptAir Flight 990 (a Boeing 767) plunged into
the Atlantic, killing all 217 on board including
33 Egyptian army officers.
No mechanical cause for the crash was ever found, and it was blamed on a
"suicidal Muslim" co-pilot,
a claim that was
publicised by the New York Times, which had been
under Jewish ownership since
1896. In September 2000 Zakheim was co-signatory to
Rebuilding America's Defenses, a report published by The Project for the
New American Century (PNAC),
which wrote of the advantages of a "new
Pearl Harbor", i.e. a false-flag terrorist act such as the electronic
hijacking of several aircraft with corresponding controlled demolitions of
several high-rises that would serve as casus belli for war. In February 2001
Zakheim
was
nominated by George W. Bush to serve as Comptroller at the Pentagon and
Under Secretary of Defense.
Zakheim was sworn in as Pentagon
Comptroller and Chief Financial Officer for the Department of Defense on May
4. On March 3, 2000, it had been reported that
the
Pentagon's finances were "in disarray", and that in 1999 the Defense
Department's accountants had needed to make almost $7 trillion in "adjustments"
to try to reconcile bookkeeping discrepancies. They could not show receipts for
$2.3 trillion of those corrections. There were hundreds of computer systems
running various military accounts, but these were not integrated, and the
financial records were not up to accounting standards or capable of even facing
an audit.
Thus, at the time Dov Zakheim was nominated for the position as Comptroller in charge of the Pentagon
accounts, it was well known to potential fraudsters intent on stealing hundreds
of billions of dollars that a terrorist strike targeting the Pentagon's
bookkeeping section, destroying computers and documents, and
killing dozens of accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts, would destroy any money trail
leading back to them. On March 11, 2002, exactly six months after the Pentagon's
bookkeeping section was targeted in a terrorist strike, Rabbi Dov Zakheim
delivered a commemorative sermon on the Pentagon lawn to hundreds of
co-religionists from 40 countries. Chabad
Lubavitch rabbis
had gathered ostensibly to launch the centenary commemoration of their
spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson aka The Rebbe, yet
the rabbis sang "Oseh Shalom" at 9:38 a.m. at the crash site, exactly six
months after the Pentagon had been attacked. The Rebbe was born April 5, not March
11, in 1902.
Prior to 9/11/01, Israel already had a well-deserved reputation for staging
false-flag terrorism and a known capability for doing so. On September 10, 2001,
the Washington Times published details of a study by the Army School of
Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), which had
this to say of Israel's
Mossad: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S.
forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
How many people are friends with three Israeli premiers? Even if six or seven
thousand, such an exclusive group would be 1 in a million. And Larry
Silverstein, the front man who took over the WTC lease six weeks before 9/11/01,
and didn't go to the Windows on the World restaurant on the morning of 9/11/01 although he had
done so every other
morning since July 26, 2001, happened to be from such a group.
When two hours' advance warning of an attack on the WTC was transmitted via
an instant messaging company, Odigo, that had an office in New York, the company
happened to be Israeli. The Israeli population is the 1 in 898 group. However, Odigo's Israeli research and development office
just happened to be in Herzliya, the location of
the Mossad's headquarters and of
Don Radlauer who was
working to promote the "Arabs did 9/11" legend as early as September
13, 2001, with a claim that hijacking, steering and navigating Boeing aircraft
would have been an "easy" task for hijackers. The population of Herzliya was 87,000 at the end of 2009,
making this group 1 in 79,300 of the world population.
The ex-Sayeret Matkal Zionist Jew Daniel Lewin was reputedly on Flight 11, as
mentioned above. The elite commando unit is clearly a very
exclusive group.
The ex-Sayeret Matkal
Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu wrote in 1995 about
"militant Islam" bringing
down the World Trade Center, twenty years after he earned a B.Sc. degree in
architecture from MIT - where he
used the
surname Nitay, also having gained an M.Sc. in business management there, in
which his thesis was on the impact of computers in the newspaper industry and
how they could enhance newspapers' political power.
As for the London 7/7 bombings, Efraim Halevy, the London-born director of the Mossad from 1998 - 2002, inadvertently
gave away
his intimate knowledge of the operation by revealing in an article he wrote
for the July 7 edition of the Jerusalem Post that he knew the bombings were
simultaneous. The British authorities spent the next two days claiming that the
three Tube explosions were
spread over a period of 26 minutes from 08:51 to 09:17, before revising the
story to simultaneous explosions.
The official tale of "Muslim suicide bombers" was
physically impossible, given the actual train times of the day following
problems with the overhead lines in the Mill Hill area, and the official
scenario of exploding backpacks was contradicted by eyewitness reports and
photos indicating that the explosions
originated underneath the carriages. The Israeli company
Verint Systems, a subsidiary of Israel's
Comverse Technology,
handled video security
at the London Underground.
Benjamin Netanyahu
and
Rudy Giuliani were both located in London on the morning
of the 7/7 bombings.
Netanyahu, obviously having foreknowledge of the terror operation, did not turn up for his scheduled
speech at the 4th annual Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) Investors Conference in
the Great Eastern Hotel. In an attempt at explanation, it was claimed that
Scotland Yard had
provided a warning. However, Scotland Yard refused to play along with the
Israelis. It was later admitted via the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag that
Mossad
agents
in London had advance knowledge, although the Mossad inserted a false, wildly
unrealistic claim that they did not know until six minutes prior to the first
explosion.
Giuliani, who was the boss and
very good friend of
former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik and the godfather of his young children,
can be placed
in Yorkshire the
day before 7/7/05. Miraculously, rather like the "discovery" (announced by
Kerik) of a passport bearing the name Satan al-Suqami, a till receipt obtained from a
garden center at Tulip Retail Park in Leeds, Yorkshire was
"found" to have survived
one of the deadly Tube train blasts, and cited as 'evidence' for the official
version of events.
