Jewish Think Tank Advocates Deliberate Targeting of Journalists

"Although it seems unthinkable now, future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media... The point of all this is simple: Win. In warfare, nothing else matters. If you cannot win clean, win dirty. But win."

Retired Colonel Ralph Peters, writing for JINSA in the Journal of International Security Affairs

Over the years, Jewish academics and theologians have advocated the deliberate targeting of women and children in war zones, the extermination of all Palestinian males, the annihilation of the entire Arab population in general, the destruction of all European capitals with nuclear weapons, the "collective deportation" of the Palestinian people to ensure the exclusively Jewish nature of the apartheid state (the Jerusalem Summit is another academic institution that promotes this solution and Tzipi Livni has similar ideas), and even outright proclaimed that "there's no place for morals" when it comes to Israel's security. Now the Jewish Institute For National Security Affairs (JINSA) has published a report openly calling for the deliberate targeting of journalists on the battlefield.

U.S. Colonel Advocates U.S. 'Military Attacks' on 'Partisan Media' in Essay for Neocon, Pro-Israel Group JINSA

By Jeremy Scahill

In the era of embedded media, independent journalists have become the eyes and ears of the world. Without those un-embedded journalists willing to risk their lives to place themselves on the other side of the barrel of the tank or the gun or under the airstrikes, history would be written almost entirely from the vantage point of powerful militaries, or—at the very least—it would be told from the perspective of the troops doing the shooting, rather than the civilians who always pay the highest price.

In the case of the Iraq invasion and occupation, the journalists who have placed themselves in danger most often are local Iraqi journalists. Some 116 Iraqi journalists and media workers have been killed in the line of duty since March 2003. In all, 189 journalists have been killed in Iraq. At least 16 of these journalists were killed by the US military, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. The network that has most often found itself under US attack is Al Jazeera. As I wrote a few years ago in The Nation:

The United States bombed its offices in Afghanistan in 2001, shelled the Basra hotel where Al Jazeera journalists were the only guests in April 2003, killed Iraq correspondent Tareq Ayoub a few days later in Baghdad and imprisoned several Al Jazeera reporters (including at Guantánamo), some of whom say they were tortured. In addition to the military attacks, the US-backed Iraqi government banned the network from reporting in Iraq.

A new report for a leading neoconservative group which pushes a belligerent “Israel first” agenda of conquest in the Middle East suggests that in future wars the US should make censorship of media official policy and advocates “military attacks on the partisan media.” (H/T MuzzleWatch) The report for JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, was authored by retired US Army Colonel Ralph Peters. It appears in JINSA’s “flagship publication,” The Journal of International Security Affairs. “Today, the United States and its allies will never face a lone enemy on the battlefield. There will always be a hostile third party in the fight,” Peters writes, calling the media, “The killers without guns:”

Of course, the media have shaped the outcome of conflicts for centuries, from the European wars of religion through Vietnam. More recently, though, the media have determined the outcomes of conflicts. While journalists and editors ultimately failed to defeat the U.S. government in Iraq, video cameras and biased reporting guaranteed that Hezbollah would survive the 2006 war with Israel and, as of this writing, they appear to have saved Hamas from destruction in Gaza.
[…]
Although it seems unthinkable now, future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media. Perceiving themselves as superior beings, journalists have positioned themselves as protected-species combatants. But freedom of the press stops when its abuse kills our soldiers and strengthens our enemies. Such a view arouses disdain today, but a media establishment that has forgotten any sense of sober patriotism may find that it has become tomorrow’s conventional wisdom.
The point of all this is simple: Win. In warfare, nothing else matters. If you cannot win clean, win dirty. But win. Our victories are ultimately in humanity’s interests, while our failures nourish monsters.

It is, of course, very appropriate that such a despicable battle cry for murdering media workers appears in a JINSA publication. The organization has long boasted an all-star cast of criminal “advisors.” Among them: Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, James Woolsey, John Bolton, Douglas Feith and others. JINSA, along with the Project for a New American Century, was one of the premiere groups in shaping US policy during the Bush years and remains a formidable force with Obama in the White House.
Reading Colonel Peters’s sick and twisted essay reminded me of the report that emerged in late 2005 about an alleged Bush administration plot to bomb Al Jazeera’s international headquarters in Qatar, which I covered for The Nation:

Britain’s Daily Mirror reported that during an April 2004 White House meeting with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, George W. Bush floated the idea of bombing Al Jazeera’s international headquarters in Qatar. This allegation was based on leaked “Top Secret” minutes of the Bush-Blair summit. British Attorney General Lord Goldsmith has activated the Official Secrets Act, threatening any publication that publishes any portion of the memo (he has already brought charges against a former Cabinet staffer and a former parliamentary aide). So while we don’t yet know the contents of the memo, we do know that at the time of Bush’s meeting with Blair, the Administration was in the throes of a very public, high-level temper tantrum directed against Al Jazeera. The meeting took place on April 16, at the peak of the first US siege of Falluja, and Al Jazeera was one of the few news outlets broadcasting from inside the city. Its exclusive footage was being broadcast by every network from CNN to the BBC.

The Falluja offensive, one of the bloodiest assaults of the US occupation, was a turning point. In two weeks that April, thirty marines were killed as local guerrillas resisted US attempts to capture the city. Some 600 Iraqis died, many of them women and children. Al Jazeera broadcast from inside the besieged city, beaming images to the world. On live TV the network gave graphic documentary evidence disproving US denials that it was killing civilians. It was a public relations disaster, and the United States responded by attacking the messenger.

Just a few days before Bush allegedly proposed bombing the network, Al Jazeera’s correspondent in Falluja, Ahmed Mansour, reported live on the air, “Last night we were targeted by some tanks, twice…but we escaped. The US wants us out of Falluja, but we will stay.” On April 9 Washington demanded that Al Jazeera leave the city as a condition for a cease-fire. The network refused. Mansour wrote that the next day “American fighter jets fired around our new location, and they bombed the house where we had spent the night before, causing the death of the house owner Mr. Hussein Samir. Due to the serious threats we had to stop broadcasting for few days because every time we tried to broadcast the fighter jets spotted us we became under their fire.”

On April 11 senior military spokesperson Mark Kimmitt declared, “The stations that are showing Americans intentionally killing women and children are not legitimate news sources. That is propaganda, and that is lies.” On April 15 Donald Rumsfeld echoed those remarks in distinctly undiplomatic terms, calling Al Jazeera’s reporting “vicious, inaccurate and inexcusable…. It’s disgraceful what that station is doing.” It was the very next day, according to the Daily Mirror, that Bush told Blair of his plan. “He made clear he wanted to bomb al-Jazeera in Qatar and elsewhere,” a source told the Mirror. “There’s no doubt what Bush wanted to do—and no doubt Blair didn’t want him to do it.”

Lest people think that the views of people like Col. Ralph Peters and the JINSA/PNAC neocons are relics of the past, remember that the Obama administration includes heavy hitters from this world among its ranks, as well as fierce neocon supporters. While they may no longer be literally calling the shots, as they did under Bush/Cheney, their disproportionate influence on US policy endures.

~~~

More on JINSA:

JINSA Behind Drive To Cover-Up Israeli Spy Scandal

The Men From JINSA and CSP

JINSA Promotes "Ex-Terrorist" Walib Shoebat at 'Homeland Security' Conference (Shoebat is a fraud)

JINSA Calls on Congress to Fund Missile Defense Sites in Poland and the Czech Republic

September 13, 2001: JINSA Calls for Regime Change in Iraq

'Bomb Them All': JINSA's September 13 2001 press release

JINSA Blames Iran For HAMAS Rocket Attacks

Pro-Israel Mouthpiece Says Freedom of Speech Dangerous

JINSA Applauds Obama's Decision to Boycott Durban II

AIPAC Caught Meddling in U.S. Foreign Policy - Yet Again

"You can’t have an Israeli policy other than what AIPAC gives you around here."

Former U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings

See this article at The Raw Story:

Congressional leaders inadvertently expose Israeli lobbyists behind letter to Obama

GOP House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA) and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) circulated a letter to colleagues this week urging President Obama to support Israel when moving forward with any Israeli peace process.

Trouble is, they forgot to delete the name of the lobbying group involved in the letter from the document.

Attached to the email message they circulated when seeking signatures from other members of Congress was the document, titled, "AIPAC Letter Hoyer Cantor May 2009.pdf."

The excuse from an aide of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer was, "The letter was discussed with AIPAC, [so] a staffer named it that."

Bullshit, AIPAC would've written it, and Stoyer, Cantor et al would've just obediently signed it. It wouldn't be the first time AIPAC has written letters and even legislation for Congress. Remember H.R. 362, which called for a naval blockade of Iran? Written by AIPAC, in line with Ehud Olmert's proposal to blockade Iran at a meeting with 12 members of Congress just three days before the resolution was introduced in the House. One of those 12 members of Congress just happened to be the same Steny Hoyer who circulated the aforementioned AIPAC letter to his colleagues.

Same with Senate Resolution 534 of 2006, a "resolution condemning Hezbollah and Hamas and their state sponsors and supporting Israel's exercise of its right to self-defense" during the Lebanon war -- written by AIPAC:

On July 18, the Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution "condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel's exercise of its right to self-defense." After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging "all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure," the House version passed by a landslide, 410 to 8.

AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it. "They [Congress] were given a resolution by AIPAC," said former Carter Administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, who addressed the House Democratic Caucus on July 19. "They didn't prepare one."

Same with H.R. 34, "recognizing Israel's right to defend itself against attacks from Gaza, reaffirming the United States' strong support for Israel" during the recent Gaza massacre -- written by AIPAC.

Today AIPAC's website is bragging about the $555 million in aid that it conned Congress into pledging to Israel, which is only a fraction of the massive $2.775 billion that Israel is expected to receive in a military aid package proposed for 2010.

Despite expectations that the Obama administration will pressure Israel to accept a two-state solution and implement practical measures, the U.S. administration has sent signals that aid to Israel will, in fact, be raised. At the same time, the budget also imposes harsh conditions on the Palestinian Authority in order to receive aid.

According to the Israeli daily, Haaretz, the budget proposed to Congress for 2010 includes $2.775 billion in aid to Israel, compared to $2.5 billon budgeted for 2009. This is more than a 10% increase in total U.S. aid to Israel.

The Congress might as well just stop pretending, hoist the Israeli flag and outsource its bill-writing to Israel. Do away with the red-white-and-blue, and just fly the blue and white.



AIPAC 2009: The Movie

Deja Vu: The Lobby Takes Aim at Another University Professor

It's another Israel Lobby hit-job, just like the one that resulted in Norman Finkelstein being denied tenure at De Paul University, Chicago. This time it's William I. Robinson of the University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB), who like Finkelstein is a Jewish academic, and who, also like Finkelstein, has the overwhelming support of his students against the debate-stifling, free speech-suppressing tactics of the Zionist Lobby.

Leading the campaign against Robinson is the notorious ADL of B'nai B'rith and the Simon Weisenthal Center, who were alerted of Robinson's alleged "anti-Semitism" by two Jewish students attending one of his classes.

Two Jewish students dropped the class, saying they felt intimidated by the professor's message. They contacted the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which advised them to file formal complaints with the university.

In their letters, senior Rebecca Joseph and junior Tova Hausman accused Robinson of violating the campus' faculty code of conduct by disseminating personal, political material unrelated to his course.

"I was shocked," said Joseph, 22. "He overstepped his boundaries as a professor. He has his own freedom of speech, but he doesn't have the freedom to send his students his own opinion that is so strong."

Does that even make sense? Presumably, free speech is ok by Joseph as long as your opinions aren't too 'strong'. The message that poor little Rebecca is referring to is an email that Professor Robinson forwarded to his sociology students containing information, images and commentary regarding the recent Gaza massacre. What the Terror State did to Gaza is definitely "shocking", but check out the content of the original email and see how "intimidated" you feel. Even the slavishly pro-Israel Zionists at The New Republic are sick of all the fuss, exclaiming "Enough With the Campus Inquisitions!"

An Interview with William Robinson
Zionist Lobby Targets Another Tenured Professor

By DOUG HENWOOD

Doug Henwood: We're now joined by William Robinson, who is a Professor of Sociology at the University of California in Santa Barbara, someone I met about six or seven years ago at a conference and, although I've disagreed with him on some issues, I thought he's a serious and thoughtful guy. I was very distressed to learn, reading Insider Higher Ed, the website, today that he's being persecuted by the Zionist lobby for an e-mail that he sent around to some of his students. Welcome William Robinson, tell us the story of what you sent and what's been happening.

William Robinson: Yes, good afternoon to everyone. I included some material which was highly critical of the Israeli invasion of Gaza as part of the reading material for a course on globalization and global affairs, and this was in January. And I am now facing charges, here at the university, of anti-semitism and violating the faculty code of conduct because two students in the course - there were eighty students - these two submitted a formal letter of complaint that they found offensive the material condemning the invasion of Gaza. The students immediately withdrew from the course, I don't even know them personally. And what is particularly egregious about this case is not that the students submitted a complaint - any student is allowed to do that - but rather that the university took the complaint seriously and is actually prosecuting me...

DH: You have tenure right?

WR: Yes, I am tenured, I am a full time professor...

DH: So in theory you're protected against persecution for your beliefs.

WR: No, in theory, I have total, I and even if I don't have tenure, have academic freedom, and this is in total violation of my academic freedom and of all of the principles of academic freedom, and of the university's own charter on academic freedom, and the American Association of University Professors principles and procedures on academic freedom, so there is absolutely no basis for any of this. What's going on, and I want to explain, behind the scenes we have been able to find out - students on campus and faculty have formed a Committee to Defend Academic Freedom which is taking up this issue, and by the way, there is a blog that they put up with all of this information, which at some point I would like to give your listeners - but we have found out that the Anti-Defamation League, which, as you know, and your listeners probably know, is an organization which, at one time, did very good and very important work in denouncing anti-Semitism, but since then has become a, basically, a mouthpiece for the Israeli government, a defender of the policies and practices of the Israeli state, and goes after and attacks anyone that criticizes those policies. So these students did not even accuse me of doing anything which we would consider anti-Semitism - discrimination against Jews, against the Jewish religion and so forth - they said openly and outright that the professor introduces material which criticized the state of Israel and that equals anti-semitism.

DH: Now, I think some people found offensive that you had likened Israeli behavior to the Nazis. Is that an issue?

WR: Well I didn't do that. What I did was I forwarded several items from the world media, from the internet media. One item was an article written by a Jewish journalist in a Jewish newspaper here in the United States, and it was criticizing the invasion of Gaza...

DH: So you didn't endorse this position?

WR: I didn't endorse it but I did include, I said, in presenting this material, I said that Gaza is Israel's Warsaw and I explained the context. That's because in Warsaw the Nazi's surrounded Warsaw, concentrated Jews in Warsaw, wouldn't let anyone in, wouldn't let anyone out, wouldn't let supplies in, wouldn't let supplies out; as a result there was famine and disease and so forth...

DH: Which is exactly what's...

WR: ...exactly and precisely what the Israeli's are doing in Gaza. And that's been denounced by the Red Cross, the United Nations, the international human rights organizations, and moreover, academic freedom totally allows me to present such controversial material and that's part of what the university is all about. We academically debate these controversial issues. I want to explain though what happened. We got some inside information in the last week. The president of the Anti-Defamation League Abraham Fox-...

DH: Foxman

WR: Foxman, he arrived here in Santa Barbara and he called a meeting with a select group of faculty, and he called the meeting for no other reason than to say that we want Professor Robinson prosecuted, and this is explosive. We have just learned about this; we're going to go public with it. And so there is this outside Israel lobby which has come on to campus, and which is accusing me of anti-Semitism and of doing all of these terrible things in order to create an atmosphere of complete intimidation. You know that anyone who criticizes the policies of the state of Israel is silenced, and is given that label of anti-semitism; that's a way of creating this atmosphere of intimidation, that no one can speak out about what's going on in Israel-Palestine, and so forth. That's the larger context.

DH: Ok, I'm sorry to make this so rushed, but this is a last minute addition and the rest of the show is full, just let me conclude...What can people do?

WR: [Go to] sb4af.wordpress.com. That's the blog that the Committee to Defend Academic Freedom has set up, and a lot of this information is on there, a lot of the documents are on there.

DH: All right, well thank you William Robinson and best of luck in your fight and we'll be back to look at this in the future.

WR: Thank-you, thank-you very much.

DH: I've been speaking with William Robinson, who is a professor of sociology at the University of California at Santa Barbara, under persecution by the intellectual police at the Zionist lobby, the Anti-Defamation League.
__

More from Professor Robinson here, and Robinson is interviewed by Hesham Tillawi here on Youtube. Also see another Professor Robinson whine about the other one being 'anti-American', losing the ensuing debate big-time in the comment thread below.

The American Bankocracy

"The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power– political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future."

Senator Barry Goldwater, 1979

Obama is considered by many to be the Wall Street President, almost as if it's a first in U.S. politics, but nothing could be further from the truth. With the advent of the Global Financial Crisis (or GFC - might as well give it its own acronym since we'll be hearing about it ad nauseam for a long time yet), now is a good time to review the history of the Wall Street Establishment's incestuous relationship with the U.S. government and the extent to which America is ruled not so much by its politicians, but by the banking interests that fund, select and control them.

Murray N. Rothbard's article Wall Street, Banks and American Foreign Policy, written in 1984 and first published by a small financial journal called the World Market Perspective, is an epic historical account of the control and manipulation of the U.S. government by the big banks and their agents, from the Lincoln era all the way up to the end of the Reagan Administration. His article details the massive influence of Morgan and Rockefeller banking interests on the U.S. government and its foreign affairs throughout the 20th century - from within and without - which by 1973 had come together in the form of the Trilateral Commission. This shady organisation has hand-picked, vetted and groomed for office every presidential candidate since Nixon, including Obama.

Rothbard, until his death in 1995, was a Jewish-American economist, author and intellectual, and a fierce opponent of fractional reserve banking and the Federal Reserve [.pdf] (also see Rothbard's The Mystery of Banking [.pdf]). He was also a staunch anti-Zionist [.pdf] who wrote about the hypocrisy of the ADL and the "menace" of what he called "Organised Anti-Anti-Semitism".

The major fount of OAAS [Organised Anti-Anti-Semitism] is the venerable Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL), the head of what the grand Old Rightist John T. Flynn referred to during World War II as the "Smear Bund." (Flynn was forced to publish himself his expose of the orchestrated smear of isolationists in his pamphlet, The Smear Terror.) Since the end of World War II, the key strategy of the ADL has been to broaden its definition of anti-Semitism to include any robust criticisms of the State of Israel. Indeed, the ADL and the rest of the OAAS has formed itself into a mighty praetorian guard focusing on Israeli interests and Israeli security.

Rothbard's article Wall Street, Banks and American Foreign Policy is not what I would call entertainment - it's rich in detail and scrutinises the minutiae of each politician's banking and/or commercial connections - but it's a must-read for anyone interested in the history of the financial elite's stranglehold on the government of the United States. And it's probably more important and salient now than it was when it was written in '84.

Wall Street, Banks and American Foreign Policy

CIA: Israel Will Vanish From the Pages of Time

Despite the American establishment's outrage at some of the statements made by Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (and even at some that he didn't make), the CIA seems to agree wholeheartedly with him on the fate of the Zionist State.

Ahmadinejad:

"It is impossible that the Zionist regime will survive. Collapse is in the nature of this regime because it has been created on aggression, lying, oppression and crime."

The CIA:

"[There will be] an inexorable movement away from a two-state to a one-state solution, as the most viable model based on democratic principles of full equality that sheds the looming specter of colonial Apartheid while allowing for the return of the 1947/1948 and 1967 refugees. The latter being the precondition for sustainable peace in the region."

These are the conclusions of a recently released CIA report, which is being passed along to a few U.S. lawmakers but so far not available to the public. More on this upbeat and optimistic report from the PressTV website:

[International lawyer Franklin Lamb] said CIA, in its report, alludes to the unexpectedly quick fall of the apartheid government in South Africa and recalls the disintegration of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, suggesting the end to the dream of an 'Israeli land' would happen 'way sooner' than later.

(The CIA predicts Israel has about 20 more years before it wipes itself off the map).

The study further predicts the return of over one and a half million Israelis to Russia and other parts of Europe, and denotes a decline in Israeli births whereas a rise in the Palestinian population.

Lamb said given the Israeli conduct toward the Palestinians and the Gaza strip in particular, the American public -- which has been voicing its protest against Tel Aviv's measures in the last 25 years -- may 'not take it anymore'.

Well, let's hope they don't 'take it anymore'. America would definitely be much better off without Israel.

Also see Franklin Lamb's Fearing a One-State Solution, Israel’s President Serves Pabulum to Washington, and The Case Against Israel's Right to Exist.

Obama to Force Israel to Allow Inspections of Dimona Nuclear Facility

That is, as soon as he gives up on life altogether and begins considering his options, which might include a dignified euthanasia, a hunting trip with Dick Cheney, announcing the abolition of the Federal Reserve, or as Haaretz has suggested, pressuring Israel to open the doors of Dimona to weapons inspectors.

Last Sunday, Jim Hoagland, who writes a column on foreign affairs in The Washington Post, wrote that Obama should learn from president John F. Kennedy and call for worldwide nuclear disarmament. Hoagland's columns generally express the consensus of the U.S. foreign affairs establishment. Kennedy was the last American president to have tried to stop the Israeli nuclear project. He threatened that there would be serious ramifications vis-a-vis U.S. support for Israel if the reactor in Dimona was not opened to frequent visits by inspectors. The pressure that Kennedy applied on the matter of Dimona was apparently one of the factors in David Ben-Gurion's resignation in 1963. Kennedy's assassination several months later led to a relaxation of that pressure and Israel was able to complete construction of the reactor in the Negev.

What an incredibly handy, uncannily timed (but of course totally-fortuitous-because-to-hint-at-anything-otherwise-would-be-antisemitic) stroke of luck that was for the terror state! With Kennedy out of the way, the Zionists were able to put the finishing touches on their arsenal of death, and become even more belligerent and dangerous than they were before they stole Palestine and proceeded to wage a series of wars of aggression against their Arab neighbors and surrounding Middle Eastern nations. About a dozen wars so far - not including countless other less epic conflicts - in which Israel was the aggressor in every instance but one.

Israel's nuclear arsenal was the ultimate achievement for the international Zionist elite, the realisation of a long-awaited dream of the founding fathers of modern Ziostan. Suddenly 'Israel', the illegitimate child of scheming international bankers who already controlled the greatest nations on Earth through their central banks, was not to be fucked with. Israel had its 'Samson Option', evinced here by Martin van Creveld, professor of military history at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem:

'We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother." I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.'

Obama will keep his mouth shut on the Dimona issue, of course. Obama is Israel's bitch.


Israel's Nuclear Weapons Arsenal

JFK's Letter to Israeli P.M. Levi Eshkol

The Mossad Role in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy

Mossad and the JFK Assassination

Israel Killed JFK, Says Vanunu

Final Judgement: The Mossad Assassinated JFK

More Evidence Mossad Killed
JFK Over Israeli Nukes

Israel Threatening World Security

Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran

E.U. Poll: Israel Biggest Threat to World Peace

U.S. Nuclear Weapons Being “Guarded” by Israel

ElBaradei: Ignoring Israeli Nukes a Double Standard

The Jewish Face of Congress

"No words can express our gratitude to you for the years of your generous support, understanding and cooperation, which are all but beyond compare in modern history."

Yitzhak Rabin in a 1994 speech to the U.S. Congress

The Forward is worth checking out from time to time, in order to keep an eye on the machinations of American Jewry.

There would be enough members for a whole new minyan in Congress if all the Jewish candidates running for federal office were elected next month.

Regardless of the election outcome, Jews continue to be well represented, at least in terms of raw numbers, on Capitol Hill. Though Jews are only about 2% of America’s total population, Jewish lawmakers already represent nearly 10% of Congress. They include 29 Jews in the House and 13 in the Senate.

That means the Senate is 13% Jewish, since there are 100 members in total.

All but three — Virginia’s Eric Cantor in the House, and Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania and Norm Coleman of Minnesota in the Senate — are Democrats. Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman is considered an Independent, but he remains a registered Democrat despite his hearty support for Republican nominee John McCain.

That makes perfect sense in light of the fact that a full 50% of the Democratic party's political donations come from rich Jewish donors, as another article from the Forward reveals.

[Strategists] say that money from Jewish donors constitutes about half the donations given to national Democratic candidates (an extremely large pot of gelt long coveted by the GOP).

Pulitzer prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh on Jewish money controlling the American political process, in an interview with Amy Goodman of Democracy Now: 

 SEYMOUR HERSH: Money. A lot of the Jewish money from New York. Come on, let's not kid about it. A significant percentage of Jewish money, and many leading American Jews support the Israeli position that Iran is an existential threat. And I think it’s as simple as that. When you’re from New York and from New York City, you take the view of -- right now, when you’re running a campaign, you follow that line. And there’s no other explanation for it, because [Hilary Clinton is] smart enough to know the downside.

AMY GOODMAN: And Obama and Edwards?

SEYMOUR HERSH: I -- you know, it’s shocking. It’s really surprising and shocking, but there we are. That’s American politics circa 2007.

As for the Gentile majority in Congress, their pro-Israel dispositions are probably more attributable to AIPAC's deathgrip on the House and Senate than their philosophical positions and actual policy preferences.

It is widely acknowledged that the reps and senators are ticked at AIPAC, and their hostility seems to be growing these days. With upwards of 60% of their campaign contributions coming directly or indirectly from the Israel Lobby, the Democratic congressmen are not free to respond to their antiwar base. This opens them to an antiwar electoral challenge on the Left or Right from forces not subservient to AIPAC. And that could cost them their next election, a little thing which has them very worked up. Capuano's cry of "AIPAC" was no simple outburst of candor but a cri de coeur for his career.

So here we have even Congressmen and Senator's aides complaining publicly about AIPAC.

More about AIPAC's influence on the Congress from an article at The Nation:

In early March, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) held its forty-seventh annual conference in Washington. AIPAC's executive director spent twenty-seven minutes reading the "roll call" of dignitaries present at the gala dinner, which included a majority of the Senate and a quarter of the House, along with dozens of Administration officials.

As this event illustrates, it's impossible to talk about Congress's relationship to Israel without highlighting AIPAC, the American Jewish community's most important voice on the Hill. The Congressional reaction to Hezbollah's attack on Israel and Israel's retaliatory bombing of Lebanon provide the latest example of why.

On July 18, the Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution "condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel's exercise of its right to self-defense." After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging "all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure," the House version passed by a landslide, 410 to 8.

AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it. "They [Congress] were given a resolution by AIPAC," said former Carter Administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, who addressed the House Democratic Caucus on July 19. "They didn't prepare one."

Also see this letter from former U.S. Senator James Abourezk to Jeffery Blankfort.

I can tell you from personal experience that, at least in the Congress, the support Israel has in that body is based completely on political fear--fear of defeat by anyone who does not do what Israel wants done. I can also tell you that very few members of Congress--at least when I served there--have any affection for Israel or for its Lobby. What they have is contempt, but it is silenced by fear of being found out exactly how they feel. I've heard too many cloakroom conversations in which members of the Senate will voice their bitter feelings about how they're pushed around by the Lobby to think otherwise. In private one hears the dislike of Israel and the tactics of the Lobby, but not one of them is willing to risk the Lobby's animosity by making their feelings public.

But AIPAC aside, there's a significant Shabbat goy component sitting in the U.S. Congress, many of them having been groomed, courted and ultimately converted by AIPAC's brainwashing operation, the American Israel Education Foundation (AIEF).

In August 2007, nearly 10% of the House of Representatives visited the Apartheid State in just two weeks, funded entirely by the AIEF. And that's just 14 days out of a 365 day year. Nearly all of the Congress is sent to Israel for what Bradley Gordon of AIPAC describes as "educational programming". Referring to the August 2007 congressional mass exodus to the Terror State, Paul Craig Roberts writes:

According to news reports, another 40 are following these two groups during the August recess, and “by the time the year is out every single member of Congress will have made their rounds in Israel.” This claim is probably overstated, but it does show careful Israeli management of U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Former Israeli Knesset Member Uri Avenim hits the nail on the head in the final paragraphs of his article The Best Senate Money Can Buy, originally published by Haaretz:

In the US Congress they talk, not only of granting Israel the money it asks for, but also of exciting initiatives of goodwill as, for example, the transfer of the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Such steps are bound, of course, to undermine the US position and prestige in all the Islamic states; but such considerations do not worry most Congress and Senate members overmuch, as their sole aim is to be re-elected.

The paying of donations to US administration officials is considered one of the most vital sections of Israeli expenditure. Once having paid these tributes to US officials, Israel is thus guaranteed, in return, huge sums of money in the form of US grants.

For the $4.25m Israel has paid to prime the US Congress, Israel will receive a US grant totalling $2.6bn. for its money, therefore, Israel will have struck the bargain of the century, receiving an interest of 60,000 per cent on its original investment. The extra grant to Israel will increase that interest even more.

Had it been possible to cure the Israeli economic disease with the flood of US dollars, there would have been no problem. The problem is that all this cash flow is to no avail for, according to many economic experts, such arrangements make the situation even more complicated.

One thing, however, is quite clear: Israel is not the 51st state of the United States of America, as some would like to think; rather, the US Congress is one of the occupied areas of Israel.

America is truly Israel's bitch.

Update: There are now a total of 45 Jews in Congress - 32 in the House and 13 in the Senate - setting an all time record. See 'Record no. of Jews elected to Congress', Jerusalem Post, November 5.

The Never Ending Story of Jewish Violence

It's olive harvest season in the West Bank, and militant Jewish racists who inhabit the illegal settlements throughout Occupied Palestine are again determined to cause as much grief as possible for struggling Palestinian farmers. Even human rights activists seeking to provide protection for the farmers come under attack from these violent Zionist loons.

Already hundreds of olive trees have been torched in Nablus by these nutcases, some of them hundreds of years old, while the complicit IOF not only refuses to prevent the Jewish attacks but provides them with practical and moral support and goes about arresting and kidnapping Palestinians just for good measure.

Yesterday, Friday, Oct 10: 

Elderly Man, Two Kids Injured In West Bank Settler Attack

Israeli settlers injured six Palestinians as they harvested their olive trees near the illegal Israeli settlement of Brachah.

Medical sources at Radefia hospital told Ma’an that six residents of the village south of Nablus suffered bruises, fractures and wounds after settlers assaulted them. Among the victims were two children and an elderly Palestinian man.

Hospital officials identified the two injured children as eight-year-old Hesham Fayez Fathi Mansur and 12-year-old Madeeha Nassar Rashed Mansur.

70-year-old Fathi Rasheed Mansur, as well as Ibtisam Naasar Rasheed and Manal Wasfi Rasheed Mansur, both 30, were also injured in the attack.
A Palestinian Authority (PA) official responsible for village affairs told Ma’an that “dozens of Israeli settlers” attacked the Palestinians.

The official, Ghassan Daghlas, said the settlers “beat and threw stones at the residents” of the village on Friday.

More on the settlers:

Israel's Front Line Thugs: The Settlers

Settler Gang Pushes Palestinian Boy Off Roof

'I Kicked The Arab, I Stepped On His Head'

Jewish Klansmen Tie Palestinian To Power Pole, Beat Him Savagely

How I Became a Target For Jewish Terrorists

Hundreds Join In Settler Violence

Army Aids Settlers In Attacks On Farmers Harvesting Olives

Israel's Army and Settlers Fall Out: The Souring of a West Bank Romance

Israeli State-Sponsored Terrorism: The Settlers

Jewish 'Modesty Patrols' Sow Fear in Israel

Settler Attacks on Palestinians, Israeli Soldiers Increasing

Shooting Back at the Settlers

Settlers Attack Non-Violent Farmers and Activists in Ni'lin Village

Israeli Settlers Raid Palestinian Farms

Extremist Jews Storm The Aqsa Mosque Under Army Protection

West Bank On Edge as Young Radicals Settle In: Militant Jews Attack Palestinians

Settlers Kill Palestinian Girl After Hebron Funeral

Settlers Attack Palestinians

Jewish Colonizers Attack, Injure Mother and Two of Her Sons in Hebron

Shepherd Shot Dead By Settlers in West Bank

Extremist Jewish Residents of Akka Attack a Pregnant Arab Teacher

Jewish Extremists Attempt Pogrom Against Arabs in Akka

Israel's Religious Fanatics Riot in Akka

Olmert Admits Jewish Underground Active In Israel

Israeli Army Chief Slams Settler Attacks

License to Kill

America's Hypocrisy Matched Only By Israel's

Israeli Children Terrorize Palestinians on Their Way to School

Settlers Torch Hundreds of Olive Trees Around Nablus Region

Settlers Burn 3,000 Olive Trees in Southern Nablus

Settlers Cut Down At Least 20 Olive Trees

Two Palestinian Farmers Injured as Settlers Attack Olive Harvest Near Huwarra, Nablus

Settlers Vandalise West Bank Cemetary

Settlers Vandalize Muslim Graves After IDF Razes Illegal Outpost

Gideon Levy: Settlers have earned many Israelis' hatred of them

Settlers: We Hope IDF Soldiers Die, Become Like Gilad Shailt

Defeat Settler Terror

Jewish Occupiers Attack Palestinians

Bitter Harvest as Israeli Settlers Run Rampage

Palestine: The Architecture of Apartheid

Armed Settlers Burn Farmers Equipment in Burin

New Report Details Attacks on Palestinian Children by Israeli Settlers

Demanding a Settler-Free Olive Harvest

American Diplomat Decries Settler Attacks on Palestinian Farmers

IFJ Condemns Israeli Settler Attacks on Palestinian Journalists

PLO to Ask UN Security Council For Protection Against Settler Attacks

UK Urges Israeli Settlement Freeze

Enough Already: Israel's Unruly Child

EU Condemns Settler Acts of Brutality

EU Slams Brutality Carried Out By Israeli Settlers Against Palestinian Villagers

Masked Settlers Assault Palestinian Photographers

Settlers Attack Elderly Woman's Home In Hebron

Settlers Burn Palestinian Land in Burin

Settlers Rebuild Illegal Structure, Attack Palestinians

Israel Spy Chief Fears Jewish Extremist Plot

Lieberman: Shin Bet Could Be Behind Settler Violence

Two Border Police Hurt by Stone Throwing Settlers Near Hebron

Israel to End Support of Outposts

Britain to Crack Down on Exports From Israeli Settlements

Israeli Miltary Detains Seven Palestinians as Armed Settlers Wound Three Others

Israel in a Showdown With West Bank Settlers

Yesh Din Report: Only 8% of Palestinian Complaints Against Settlers Result in Indictment

Fire in Hebron: Rightists Burn Palestinian Flag

Israeli Police, IDF Evict Elderly Palestinian Couple From Home of 52 Years

UN Reports Highlight Israeli Infringement of Palestinians' Rights

Israel Must Crack Down on Violent Settlers Now

False Equivalence: The Israeli Military Calls For Action Against The Left

Settlers Beat Up Palestinian Boy Near Hebron

Palestinian Boy Attacked By Israeli Settler: YouTube

The School Run

Israel Rebrands Oppression

'Today I Carry a Gun Because I Am Afraid of the Jews, Not the Arabs'

Marked Increase in Settler Attacks on Children

Testimony: Settlers threaten and drive out Palestinians and foreign activists on their way to pick olives, October 2008

Land Thieves: Israeli Settlers Steal Land and Distort the Truth

Settler Violence Report: September and October 2008

Occupied Territories: Israeli Settlers Wage Campaign of Intimidation on Palestinians and Internationals Alike

Umm Al-Kheir Bedouin Village suffers Settler Harrassment

'Ethnic cleansing by stealth'

Jewish Settlers Beat Palestinian Shepherds: YouTube

Jewish Settlers Attack Palestinian: YouTube

Israeli Settlers Attack Palestinian Village: YouTube 1 YouTube 2

Inside Story: Israeli Settler Violence - 18 Jun 08: YouTube

Israeli Settlers Release Sewage on Palestinian Farms

Settlers Harrass the Villagers of Wadi Fuqeen

Settlers Attack Olive Harvest: YouTube

Settlers Destroy Palestinian Property: YouTube

How Israeli Settlers Control Shuhada Street: YouTube

Settlers on Israel's Eastern Frontier, by Gadi Algazi

Israeli Settlers Again Taking the Law into their Own Hands: New Wave of Settler Attacks in Northern West Bank

Palestinian Farmers, Including Child, Beaten by Masked Israeli Settlers Near Nablus

Bethlehem Man Beaten While Filing Complaint Against Settlers for Horse Theft

Who Will Stop the Settlers? Noise But No Action From US Over Family's Eviction

Tent of Evicted Jerusalem Palestinian Couple Torn Down

Settlers Overtake Al Daoudi Home in East Jerusalem

Settlers in Hebron Write Graffiti on Mosque Walls Insulting Islam, Calling For the Killing of Arabs

Livni: 'Settlements Issue Over-Exaggerated'

Settler Leader: Hebron Evacuation Will Be Met With Force Greater Than Amona

Israeli Settlers Terrorise Palestinian Villagers

Armed Settlers Confront U.S. Consulate Delegation Near Nablus

Four Settlers Held For Firing Indiscriminately at Palestinian Village in West Bank

'One Country for One People': Racist Settlers Call on PM to Reject Two State Solution

Israeli settlers set fire of Palestinian owned lands in northern West Bank

Lawlessness From Settlers

Israeli settlers attack Palestinians in northern West Bank

Israeli settlers attack two Nablus villages

Attack on U.S. Embassy in Yemen Linked to Mossad

U.S. embassy in Sanaa, Yemen

Remember the attack on the U.S. embassy in Yemen last month that took the lives of eighteen people? A group calling themselves "Islamic Jihad" claimed responsibility for the blast. It has a nice, scary ring to it hasn't it? "Islamic Jihad" also happens to be the name of a group that operates out of Gaza.

"Islamic Jihad" pointedly mentioned its affiliation with al Qaeda after claiming responsibility for the September 17 U.S. embassy bombing:

"We, the Organisation of Islamic Jihad, belonging to the Al-Qaeda network, repeat our demand of (Yemeni President) Ali Abdullah Saleh to free our detained brothers within 48 hours," said a statement signed by self-proclaimed leader Abu Ghaith al-Yamani.

Former agent for French military intelligence Pierre-Henry Bunel has this to say about 'al Qaeda':

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the 'TV watcher' to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism..."

Well now the Yemeni authorities have arrested a group of these al Qaeda-backed militants with, surprise surprise, links to Israeli intelligence.

From BBC News:

Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh has said the security forces have arrested a group of alleged Islamist militants linked to Israeli intelligence.

Mr Saleh did not say what evidence had been found to show the group's links with Israel, a regional enemy of Yemen.

The arrests were connected with an attack on the US embassy in Sanaa last month which killed at least 18 people, official sources were quoted saying.

Israel's foreign ministry has rejected the accusation as "totally ridiculous".

"A terrorist cell was arrested and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services," Mr Saleh told a gathering at al-Mukalla University in Hadramawt province.

"Details of the trial will be announced later. You will hear about what goes on in the proceedings," he added.

The 17 September attack was the second to target the US embassy since April. Militants detonated car bombs before firing rockets at the heavily fortified building.

Mr Saleh did not identify the suspects, but official sources were quoted saying it was same cell - led by a militant called Abu al-Ghaith al-Yamani - whose arrest was announced a week after the attack.

An Israeli foreign ministry spokesman said the Yemeni president's statement was without foundation.

"To believe that Israel would create Islamist cells in Yemen is really far-fetched. This is yet another victory for the proponents of conspiracy theories," Igal Palmor said in remarks reported by AFP.

And from the Yemen Observer:

President Saleh revealed on Monday that security forces in Yemen caught an espionage network for Israel made up of Arab nationals. This announcement came during his speech in front of MP's, Shura Council members, local council members, scholars and military and security leaders at Hadhramout University.

According to the president the suspected spies will be brought before the courts shortly in a public trial after investigations are complete.

The network was comprised of 40 people from different Arab nationalities spying for Mossad, the Israeli international intelligence said sources from National and Political Security Units. The members of the espionage network entered Yemen on the premise of conducting business, tourism and even for preaching in mosques. Saleh said that the suspected spies form a terrorism cell that uses also Islam to reach their targets.Members were arrested individually and found to be in possession of detailed maps for sensitive security sites, intelligence telecommunication units and advanced tracking devices.

And from another Oct 8 news report:

Dubai, Oct 8 (IANS) A terrorist cell busted in Yemen last month after a suicide attack on the US embassy there had links with an Israeli intelligence agency, the state-run Saba news agency reported. The report, quoting an unnamed source, said investigations and data retrieved from a computer seized from the cell, showed there was correspondence between the Islamic Jihad group’s deputy leader Bassam Abdullah Fadhel Al-Haidari and an Israeli intelligence agency.

Saba quoted the source as saying that the correspondence between the two sides included a request from the Israeli side to implement terrorist attacks inside Yemen.

Update: Here is the Saba news report mentioned above.

The Jewish Terrorists of the JDO and JDL

JDO militants pose for a photo at their
training ground, Camp Jabotinsky

You'd be forgiven for thinking that the photo above depicts a group of violent crazies from an illegal settlement somewhere in the West Bank, but these are American Jews, members of the extremist New York-based Jewish Defense Organization (JDO).

Check out the JDO website for some light entertainment. These militant Zionist Jews are hardcore Kahanist Jabotinskyites - fans of the criminal founder of Irgun, Ze'ev (or Vladimir) Jabotinsky. The head of the JDO, Mordechai Levy, is a criminal himself, having spent 18 months of a 4 1/2 year sentence in prison for attempted murder after trying to shoot Jewish Defense League (JDL) leader Irv Rubin. Rubin is another criminal Jew who got prison time for plotting bomb attacks in a mosque and in the office of Arab-American congressman Darrel Issa. He later committed suicide in prison. The Jew who tried to kill him, our JDO militant Mordechai Levy, was also charged with a July 2000 assault on a 12 year old boy at a JDO "summer camp", and pleaded guilty. What is it with Jews and violence?


A militant Zionist Jew teaches a little Jewish kid how
to deal with the Goyim at a JDO "summer camp"

To finally put to rest the silly myth that Jews are more intelligent than the rest of us, check out the grammar of these JDO dufuses:

WE NEED VOLUNTEERS TO GIVE 1 NIGHT A WEEK 4 HOURS TO HELP MAKE SURE THAT "NEVER AGAIN" A CROWN HEIGHTS POGROM RIOT AGAINST JEWS!!! VOLUNTEER AND GIVE A JEWISH DARN ABOUT YOUR FELLOW JEWS BEING ATTACKED DAILY THERE!!!

Violently stupid, and deceitful as well. Lies are underlined, violence is in bold:

Tonight JDO Security Team beat a group of Moslem terrorists from the PLO and Hamas along with a group of anarchists who had accompanied them physically at their "Death to Israel, Death to the Jews " protest. Why? The reason was tonight well meaning Jews had organized a concert for Israel at Radio City Music Hall at which five thousand Jews were coming to hear top entertainers. JDO had gotten info that PLO and Hamas were going to come to ruin this Israel concert.At 7:30 Pm JDO ST had arrived and across the street were 500 vile Israel hating and Jew-Hating demonstrators calling for the Jews in Israel to be slaughtered and killed and supporting bombings against Jews in Israel and worldwide against Jews done by Islamic terrorists. Strangely enough one third of the group of anarchists and communists chanting the same and passing out flyers [sic] praising armed PLO and Hamas attacks on Jews, were Jews themselves!! Art [sic] this point JDO ST had plans to really wreck their march, but at 8 PM the PLO, Hamas and Israel hating anarchists charged from across the street to beat, pummel and push the many Jews waiting in line for the pro-Israel concert. JDO ST thank G-D immediately physically fought off these vile attackers of Jews. Thank G-D many in JDO routed the PLO and Hamas and stopped them from seriously hurting Jews. Many Jews in the crowd joined with JDO to literally beat back the attackers who then ran.

Actually, those referred to as the "PLO and Hamas" were in fact a non-violent group of anti-Zionist activists called Jews Remember The Nakba, and they weren't passing out "flyers praising armed PLO and Hamas attacks on Jews". This is what was on the flyers they were handing out:

No time to celebrate! Jews remember the nakba: standing in solidarity with 60+ years of Palestinian resistance to Zionism. This May, while Israel marks 60 years of statehood, Palestinians around the world mourn 60 years since the Nakba - Arabic for 'catastrophe.' [Source]

If I had to bet on who started the aggro, my money would go straight on the militant right wing Kahanist karate-practising gun-nuts I'm writing this article about, not the compassionate, empathetic, antiwar bleeding hearts of Jews Remember The Nakba.

Not surprisingly, the JDO supports the immediate release of Israeli spy Johnathan Pollard, who they describe as a 'hero'. As far as hawkish American Jewry is concerned, imperiling the United States for Israel's sake is the moral duty of any self-respecting Jew. This is what the JDO website says about Pollard:

POLLARD CAUGHT GIVING INFORMATION TO ISRAEL YEARS AGO: A SO CALLED SPY FOR ISRAEL THAT GAVE INFO ON SADDAM HUSSEIN'S PLOTS TO TRY AND USE NUKES (Heaven Forbid) or chemical weapons on Israel that the US Government had found out about. Pollard, then working for the US Navy, passed the info to Israel to help protect it! Pollard for this act of heroism, has been sitting 18 years in prison. Why?

This is why, you disingenuous Zionist twats. Pollard did substantially more than just pass on information about Iraq and its "nukes":

Pollard caused enormous damage to U.S. national security. He gave Israel top-secret U.S. military intelligence and diplomatic codes; names of nearly 100 U.S. agents in the Mideast, who were then "turned" by Israel; NSA code-breaking techniques and targets; intercepts of foreign communications; and U.S. war-fighting plans for the Mideast.

According to CIA sources, Pollard provided Israeli intelligence with names of important American agents inside the former Soviet Union and Russia who had supplied information on East Bloc weapons and war plans. How the agents' names were linked to the secrets they supplied - a major breach of basic intelligence security - remains a mystery.

Some of the enormously sensitive secrets stolen by Pollard may have been either sold, or bartered, by Israel to the Soviet Union.

A number of key CIA agents in the East Bloc were allegedly executed as a result of Pollard's spying. The KGB likely gained access to top-secret U.S. codes - either directly from Israel, or through spies in Israel's government. In short, Pollard's treachery caused one of the worst security disasters in modern U.S. history

According to Seymour Hersh, Pollard himself estimates that the top secret intelligence he passed on to Israel and its agents would add up to a "stack six feet wide, six feet long, and ten feet high". The JDO, like its counterparts at the ADL, AIPAC, half the Congress and almost the entire Bush administration, hardly bother to conceal where their true loyalty lies. They don't need to while they have us convinced that questioning Israel is tantamount to antisemitism, which is of course the whole idea behind the ADL, and its primary function. It's groups like these that together constitute the power network generally referred to as the Israel lobby, and if we could just wake up to the dangers of it as a collective and act accordingly, we'd see peace break out and miracles happen.


More:

Watchdog Nation: The ADL Exposed

The ADL: America's Greatest Enemy

ADL: A History of Disinformation and Intimidation

The Anti-Defamation League's Spy Scandal of 1993

The Ugly Truth About the Anti-Defamation League

ADL Spies on Progressives, Funnels Information to Law Enforcement

ADL Attempts to Link 'Holocaust Denial' to Arab 'Terrorists'

ADL, Zionist Policies Causing Rise In Anti-Jewish Sentiment

The FBI, the ADL, and Christina Long

What is the Real Racial/Ethnic Agenda of the ADL?

The ADL Stifles Free Speech: Israel-First Groups Working Overtime To Sabotage First Amendment Rights

The ADL's Fear of the Internet

America's Most Powerful Racist Hate Group

ADL Spiked September 11 Blockbuster

The Hypocrisy of B'nai B'rith and the ADL

Fire Foxman: The ADL Denies The Armenian Genocide

ADL Training U.S. Police Departments Nationwide

The Corruption of America's Police by the ADL

The ADL Shelters Christian Zionism

Book: The Ugly Truth About The ADL [download]

David Irving's ADL Archive

The ADL-Watch Archive

Kach and Meir Kahane: The Emergence of Jewish Fascism

When Zionist Terrorists Come to Town

Power Struggle Wracking Jewish Vigilante Group

Jewish Militant Mordechai Levy Pleads Guilty To Assault On 12 Year Old Boy

Two JDL Leaders Charged In Terror Plot

Freeze on Jewish Defense League Assets Called for After JDL Bomb Plot Foiled

Jewish Defense League Unleashes Campaign of Violence in America

IDF Vets Train NY Jewish Paramilitaries

3 JDL Members Seized, Linked To At Least 6 Terror Incidents (May 1987)

B’nai Brith and JDL Bullying Tactics In Canada

Feds Probed JDL For Threats Against Rappers Tupac Shakur and Eazy-E



Jewish Betar Tagar 'activists' terrorise France. Cheers to Sullivan for the video.

Zionist Sophistry

Zionists and pro-Israel 'progressives' love to cry antisemitism when confronted with the truth. Wherever there is criticism of Israel the 'antisemitism' subterfuge comes out. The reason for this is that Zionists have no other way to respond, no recourse other than to engage in sophistry and escapism.

An erudite Zionist can't win a debate with an erudite anti-Zionist.

Zionists can't deny that Israel's leading intellectuals believe that there is 'no place for morals' when it comes to the 'defence' of the Jewish state, and that the deliberate and indiscriminate targeting of women and children, the extermination of all Palestinian males, the annihilation of the entire Arab population in general and even military attacks on media personnel are justified when it comes to protecting Israel and its image.

Zionists can't deny the fact that Israel has been in a constant state of war against its Arab neighbors since its inception in 1948, and that it's been the aggressor in every war except one (the Yom Kippur/Ramadan war, 1973) - and that Iran hasn't attacked another country for at least a millennium.

Zionists can't deny that 16 U.S. intelligence agencies unanimously agree that Iran has no nuclear weapons program, and that nuclear weapons research was outlawed in Iran by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979 on the grounds that it was un-Islamic - but they would have us believe that Iran is an "existential threat" to Israel.

Zionists can't deny the hypocrisy of Israel's constant whining and sabre-rattling against Iran for its legitimate nuclear energy program, in light of the fact that Israel has a huge arsenal of nukes hiding behind its policy of "nuclear ambiguity".

Zionists can't deny that for every Israeli child killed in Israel's war of aggression against the indigenous Palestinians, at least 9 Palestinian children die at the hands of the Israelis. They can't deny that Palestinian deaths in general are hugely disproportionate to Israeli casualities - and this is without including the deaths that occurred during the Nakba. Nor can they deny that for every Palestinian tortured and maimed, there is roughly zero Israelis tortured.

Zionists can't deny that Israeli Talmudists are the most racist people on the planet.

Zionists can't deny that U.S. foreign policy has been hijacked by dual citizenship traitors to serve the interests of the Zionist state, and that the Iraq war was launched to protect Israel and to ensure its regional hegemony.

Zionists can't deny that Israeli fingerprints are all over the false flag terror attacks of 9/11.

Zionists can't deny that Israel has been illegally occupying Palestinian land and engaging in ethnic cleansing for the entire 60 years of its existence, and that it stands in violation of more U.N. resolutions than any other state on Planet Earth. Zionists can't deny that its settlement expansion program in the West Bank is illegal by international law, or that its apartheid wall that snakes its way through Palestinian land is illegal, and that both are immoral and despicable irrespective of the rule of law.

Zionists can't even deny that the very existence of "Israel" as a nation state is illegal and illegitimate.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg as far as any debate would go.

Group Insanity: The CUFI War Cult

CUFI is one of the many Christian Zionist organisations that the American Israel lobby manipulates to its advantage. The Jerusalem Summit, a hard-line, Islamophobic Zionist outfit that advocates a solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict based on relocating the indigenous Palestinians from Palestine to other countries, provides us with an insight into how Jewish groups perceive the Evangelical Christian Right as an asset to Zionism:

[The Jerusalem Summit] endeavors to cultivate "awareness of [the] fact that the Evangelical Christian community is both a strategic ally and a strategic asset for Israel. This is a community which has not only demonstrated its staunch and unflinching support for the State of Israel and the People of Israel, but is also the only segment of humanity which has (a) the spiritual energy, (b) the numerical mass, and (c) the moral resolve to effectively confront the phenomenon of global Islamism." [source]

Not "global terrorism" or even "Islamic extremism" - "global Islamism", as in the religion itself. What the Jerusalem Summit is saying is that the Evangelical Christian community is an asset to the Zionist war on Islam.

Below is a PBS documentary hosted by Bill Moyers about the radical right wing Christians United For Israel cult, led by deluded Zionist lapdog Pastor John Hagee.

The rabidly Zionist evangelical Christian right constitutes some of the most powerfully visible evidence that Zionism is the premier threat to world peace. Watching these flag-waving religious nut-jobs cheer and weep and pray with fervour for the annihilation of Iran and its people is about as scary as it gets.

This is group insanity in its rawest form. These cultists are the embodiment of fanaticism and the unfathomable danger of institutionalised delusion. These are America's Christian equivalents to Israel's insanely racist Talmudic Zionist Jews. And they would have us believe that 'God' approves of this madness, and 'founded Israel'. T'would be a God most unholy with hands most unclean that would give rise and sustenance to that shitty little state.

God save us from these fucking lunatics.

more:

The Armageddon Lobby

Israeli Extremists and Christian Fundamentalists: The Alliance

Christian Zionism: Terror in Jesus’ Name

Crazy Zionist Christians

The Most Dangerous Cult in The World

Lobbying For Armageddon

Zion's Christian Soldiers

The Cause of the Conflict: Why Judeo-Christians Support War For Israel

As Bush's War Strategy Shifts to Iran, Christian Zionists Gear Up for the Apocalypse

Christian Zionists: Ahmadinejad Is New Hitler

Christian fundamentalism and Zionism: Time To Terminate This Unholy Alliance?

Hagee's apocalyptic support of Israel

Pastor John Hagee's Speech To AIPAC Policy Conference 2007 [.pdf]

'Pastor' John Hagee: A National Disgrace

John Hagee: Deviant Theology, Dangerous Foreign Policy

Here's a U.S. Pastor We Should Really Worry About

Christian Zionism: The New Heresy That Sways America

The Dangerous Potent Elixir of Christian Zionism

How Zionists Corrupted the Bible

Christian Zionists Lobby For U.S. Attack On Iran

Hagee: God Sent Hitler, Jews Have Dead Souls

Where Evangelicals, Zionists and NeoCons Meet: The Council for National Policy

A Heavenly Match: Bush and the Christian Zionists

The Traitors Among Us

Christian Zionists and Neocons: A Heavenly Marriage

Gary Baurer and Likud: An Unholy Allliance with the Christian Right

Onward, Christian Zionists (youtube)

More Senseless, Exclusivist Drivel From a Christian Zionist

How Jews Use and Revile the Christian Zionists