Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Five Israeli Talking Points on Gaza - Debunked

Smoke from an Israeli strike rises over the Gaza Strip. (AP, Hatem Moussa)

Israel has killed almost 800 Palestinians in the past twenty-one days in the Gaza Strip alone; its onslaught continues. The UN estimates that more than 74 percent of those killed are civilians. That is to be expected in a population of 1.8 million where the number of Hamas members is approximately 15,000. Israel does not deny that it killed those Palestinians using modern aerial technology and precise weaponry courtesy of the world’s only superpower. In fact, it does not even deny that they are civilians.

Israel’s propaganda machine, however, insists that these Palestinians wanted to die (“culture of martyrdom”), staged their own death (“telegenically dead”) or were the tragic victims of Hamas’s use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes (“human shielding”). In all instances, the military power is blaming the victims for their own deaths, accusing them of devaluing life and attributing this disregard to cultural bankruptcy. In effect, Israel—along with uncritical mainstream media that unquestionably accept this discourse—dehumanizes Palestinians, deprives them even of their victimhood and legitimizes egregious human rights and legal violations.

This is not the first time. The gruesome images of decapitated children’s bodies and stolen innocence on Gaza’s shores are a dreadful repeat of Israel’s assault on Gaza in November 2012 and winter 2008–09. Not only are the military tactics the same but so too are the public relations efforts and the faulty legal arguments that underpin the attacks. Mainstream media news anchors are inexplicably accepting these arguments as fact.

Below I address five of Israel’s recurring talking points. I hope this proves useful to newsmakers.
1) Israel is exercising its right to self-defense.
As the occupying power of the Gaza Strip, and the Palestinian Territories more broadly, Israel has an obligation and a duty to protect the civilians under its occupation. It governs by military and law enforcement authority to maintain order, protect itself and protect the civilian population under its occupation. It cannot simultaneously occupy the territory, thus usurping the self-governing powers that would otherwise belong to Palestinians, and declare war upon them. These contradictory policies (occupying a land and then declaring war on it) make the Palestinian population doubly vulnerable.

The precarious and unstable conditions in the Gaza Strip from which Palestinians suffer are Israel’s responsibility. Israel argues that it can invoke the right to self-defense under international law as defined in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The International Court of Justice, however, rejected this faulty legal interpretation in its 2004 Advisory Opinion. The ICJ explained that an armed attack that would trigger Article 51 must be attributable to a sovereign state, but the armed attacks by Palestinians emerge from within Israel’s jurisdictional control. Israel does have the right to defend itself against rocket attacks, but it must do so in accordance with occupation law and not other laws of war. Occupation law ensures greater protection for the civilian population. The other laws of war balance military advantage and civilian suffering. The statement that “no country would tolerate rocket fire from a neighboring country” is therefore both a diversion and baseless.

Israel denies Palestinians the right to govern and protect themselves, while simultaneously invoking the right to self-defense. This is a conundrum and a violation of international law, one that Israel deliberately created to evade accountability.
2) Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005.
Israel argues that its occupation of the Gaza Strip ended with the unilateral withdrawal of its settler population in 2005. It then declared the Gaza Strip to be “hostile territory” and declared war against its population. Neither the argument nor the statement is tenable. Despite removing 8,000 settlers and the military infrastructure that protected their illegal presence, Israel maintained effective control of the Gaza Strip and thus remains the occupying power as defined by Article 47 of the Hague Regulations. To date, Israel maintains control of the territory’s air space, territorial waters, electromagnetic sphere, population registry and the movement of all goods and people.

Israel argues that the withdrawal from Gaza demonstrates that ending the occupation will not bring peace. Some have gone so far as to say that Palestinians squandered their opportunity to build heaven in order to build a terrorist haven instead. These arguments aim to obfuscate Israel’s responsibilities in the Gaza Strip, as well as the West Bank. As Prime Minister Netanyahu once explained, Israel must ensure that it does not “get another Gaza in Judea and Samaria…. I think the Israeli people understand now what I always say: that there cannot be a situation, under any agreement, in which we relinquish security control of the territory west of the River Jordan.”

Palestinians have yet to experience a day of self-governance. Israel immediately imposed a siege upon the Gaza Strip when Hamas won parliamentary elections in January 2006 and tightened it severely when Hamas routed Fatah in June 2007. The siege has created a “humanitarian catastrophe” in the Gaza Strip. Inhabitants will not be able to access clean water, electricity or tend to even the most urgent medical needs. The World Health Organization explains that the Gaza Strip will be unlivable by 2020. Not only did Israel not end its occupation, it has created a situation in which Palestinians cannot survive in the long-term.
3) This Israeli operation, among others, was caused by rocket fire from Gaza.
Israel claims that its current and past wars against the Palestinian population in Gaza have been in response to rocket fire. Empirical evidence from 2008, 2012 and 2014 refute that claim. First, according to Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the greatest reduction of rocket fire came through diplomatic rather than military means. This chart demonstrates the correlation between Israel’s military attacks upon the Gaza Strip and Hamas militant activity. Hamas rocket fire increases in response to Israeli military attacks and decreases in direct correlation to them. Cease-fires have brought the greatest security to the region.

During the four months of the Egyptian-negotiated cease-fire in 2008, Palestinian militants reduced the number of rockets to zero or single digits from the Gaza Strip. Despite this relative security and calm, Israel broke the cease-fire to begin the notorious aerial and ground offensive that killed 1,400 Palestinians in twenty-two days. In November 2012, Israel’s extrajudicial assassination of Ahmad Jabari, the chief of Hamas’s military wing in Gaza, while he was reviewing terms for a diplomatic solution, again broke the cease-fire that precipitated the eight-day aerial offensive that killed 132 Palestinians.

Immediately preceding Israel’s most recent operation, Hamas rocket and mortar attacks did not threaten Israel. Israel deliberately provoked this war with Hamas. Without producing a shred of evidence, it accused the political faction of kidnapping and murdering three settlers near Hebron. Four weeks and almost 700 lives later, Israel has yet to produce any evidence demonstrating Hamas’s involvement. During ten days of Operation Brother’s Keeper in the West Bank, Israel arrested approximately 800 Palestinians without charge or trial, killed nine civilians and raided nearly 1,300 residential, commercial and public buildings. Its military operation targeted Hamas members released during the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange in 2011. It’s these Israeli provocations that precipitated the Hamas rocket fire to which Israel claims left it with no choice but a gruesome military operation.
4) Israel avoids civilian casualties, but Hamas aims to kill civilians.
Hamas has crude weapons technology that lacks any targeting capability. As such, Hamas rocket attacks ipso facto violate the principle of distinction because all of its attacks are indiscriminate. This is not contested. Israel, however, would not be any more tolerant of Hamas if it strictly targeted military objects, as we have witnessed of late. Israel considers Hamas and any form of its resistance, armed or otherwise, to be illegitimate.

In contrast, Israel has the eleventh most powerful military in the world, certainly the strongest by far in the Middle East, and is a nuclear power that has not ratified the non-proliferation agreement and has precise weapons technology. With the use of drones, F-16s and an arsenal of modern weapon technology, Israel has the ability to target single individuals and therefore to avoid civilian casualties. But rather than avoid them, Israel has repeatedly targeted civilians as part of its military operations.

The Dahiya Doctrine is central to these operations and refers to Israel’s indiscriminate attacks on Lebanon in 2006. Maj. Gen. Gadi Eizenkot said that this would be applied elsewhere:
What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on. […] We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases.
Israel has kept true to this promise. The 2009 UN Fact-Finding Mission to the Gaza Conflict, better known as the Goldstone Mission, concluded “from a review of the facts on the ground that it witnessed for itself that what was prescribed as the best strategy [Dahiya Doctrine] appears to have been precisely what was put into practice.”

According to the National Lawyers Guild, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, Israel directly targeted civilians or recklessly caused civilian deaths during Operation Cast Lead. Far from avoiding the deaths of civilians, Israel effectively considers them legitimate targets.
5) Hamas hides its weapons in homes, mosques and schools and uses human shields.
This is arguably one of Israel’s most insidious claims, because it blames Palestinians for their own death and deprives them of even their victimhood. Israel made the same argument in its war against Lebanon in 2006 and in its war against Palestinians in 2008. Notwithstanding its military cartoon sketches, Israel has yet to prove that Hamas has used civilian infrastructure to store military weapons. The two cases where Hamas indeed stored weapons in UNRWA schools, the schools were empty. UNRWA discovered the rockets and publicly condemned the violation of its sanctity.

International human rights organizations that have investigated these claims have determined that they are not true. It attributed the high death toll in Israel’s 2006 war on Lebanon to Israel’s indiscriminate attacks. Human Rights Watch notes:
The evidence Human Rights Watch uncovered in its on-the-ground investigations refutes [Israel’s] argument…we found strong evidence that Hezbollah stored most of its rockets in bunkers and weapon storage facilities located in uninhabited fields and valleys, that in the vast majority of cases Hezbollah fighters left populated civilian areas as soon as the fighting started, and that Hezbollah fired the vast majority of its rockets from pre-prepared positions outside villages.
In fact, only Israeli soldiers have systematically used Palestinians as human shields. Since Israel’s incursion into the West Bank in 2002, it has used Palestinians as human shields by tying young Palestinians onto the hoods of their cars or forcing them to go into a home where a potential militant may be hiding.

Even assuming that Israel’s claims were plausible, humanitarian law obligates Israel to avoid civilian casualties that “would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.” A belligerent force must verify whether civilian or civilian infrastructure qualifies as a military objective. In the case of doubt, “whether an object which is normally dedicated to civilian purposes, such as a place of worship, a house or other dwelling or a school, is being used to make an effective contribution to military action, it shall be presumed not to be so used.”

In the over thee weeks of its military operation, Israel has demolished 3,175 homes, at least a dozen with families inside; destroyed five hospitals and six clinics; partially damaged sixty-four mosques and two churches; partially to completely destroyed eight government ministries; injured 4,620; and killed over 700 Palestinians. At plain sight, these numbers indicate Israel’s egregious violations of humanitarian law, ones that amount to war crimes.

Beyond the body count and reference to law, which is a product of power, the question to ask is, What is Israel’s end goal? What if Hamas and Islamic Jihad dug tunnels beneath the entirety of the Gaza Strip—they clearly did not, but let us assume they did for the sake of argument. According to Israel’s logic, all of Gaza’s 1.8 million Palestinians are therefore human shields for being born Palestinian in Gaza. The solution is to destroy the 360-kilometer square strip of land and to expect a watching world to accept this catastrophic loss as incidental. This is possible only by framing and accepting the dehumanization of Palestinian life. Despite the absurdity of this proposal, it is precisely what Israeli society is urging its military leadership to do. Israel cannot bomb Palestinians into submission, and it certainly cannot bomb them into peace.

Read Next: Sharif Abdel Kouddous reports from a hospital in Gaza overwhelmed with victims of Israeli attacks. 

Source: The Nation

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Daily Mail 'Proves' Fire Brought Down WTC7

I've never used the Crimes of Zion sites to publish work by other writers (there are two CoZ blogs and you're not on the original), but as you can see, I've been about as productive as tits on a bull for some time now as far as writing goes, and the article you're about to read is an exceptional piece that I feel deserves all the attention I can give it.

The author is, in my opinion, one of the best 9/11 researchers on the scene right now, and provided the quality of his work continues along its current trend and the output remains consistent, I'd even hazard a wager that in time, he'll come to be regarded as one of the foremost amateur (i.e. unpublished, internet-based) authorities on the explosive matter of 9/11/01. Spend a bit of time on his web site and you'll see what I mean. Work as good as this can only go unnoticed for so long. 

As always, if you find this article helpful, share it. Facebook it, 'Tweet' it, e-mail it, link to it, throw it around, wherever and however you can. 

From http://www.takeourworldback.com/zitterpropaganda.htm



Daily Mail 'proves' fire brought down WTC7 


The Daily Mail's WTC7 propaganda debunked
Proof of Israel's central role in 9/11
No evidence for the "nineteen Arabs with box cutters" tinfoil conspiracy theory
Why those who say 9/11 was a Zionist job are not "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists"
Zionist control of the mainstream media
Zionist occupied government (ZOG)
Jews who believe in justice
The cancer of Zionism

The Daily Mail's WTC7 propaganda debunked


Britain's Daily Mail carries an article on its website purporting to "finally prove once and for all that Building 7 was brought down by the intense heat of the blazing World Trade Center - and not explosives, as conspiracy theorists claim". The newspaper's 'evidence' to support its bold assertion consists of a two-minute video, which shows fires burning on a couple of isolated floors in WTC7.

The footage has already been analyzed and described in detail in the 2008 NIST report on WTC7: NIST NCSTAR 1-9. The NIST report shows a number of frames taken from the footage. For example, Figure 5-143 is a frame from the video showing a close-up of fires burning on the 8th floor on the NE corner. It was taken within a few minutes of 4:00 on the afternoon of 9/11/01, about 1 hour 20 minutes before the building collapsed, and nearly an hour before the BBC reported that it had collapsed. NIST has adjusted the intensities.

 Source: NIST NCSTAR 1-9, Final Report released November 2008

The above frame occurs around 1:43 on the LiveLeak video embedded on the Daily Mail page.

Source: LiveLeak

And Figure 5-138 corresponds to a frame around 0:15 in the video. The flame height extends a little above the bottom of the window. NIST, in referring to this image, describes the flames as "small flames burning on the window frames".

Source: NIST NCSTAR 1-9, Final Report released November 2008

The Mail reporter has concocted a 'theory' of how the fires were supposed to have brought down the building - the "exterior metal beams" were "overheated" and began to "buckle", which "led to floors falling in on one another, causing the building to collapse". The article asserts that "you can even see the metal bars of the exterior buckling". However, those "exterior metal beams" or "bars" are simply aluminum window frames, and have nothing to do with holding up the steel-framed building or the floors. The exterior columns were fireproofed 14-inch W-shapes (W14) fabricated from ASTM A36 steel. There were 58 exterior columns (counting "14A") and 24 core columns.

Even NIST did not try to pretend that columns heated significantly. They ran simulations, which they termed "Case A", "Case B", and "Case C". In Case B they increased Case A temperatures by 10%, and in Case C they decreased Case A temperatures by 10%.

From 10.4 in their report:
The following is a list of findings common to the three Cases:
  • In none of the Cases did any of the columns, all of which were insulated, reach temperatures sufficiently high for significant loss of strength or stiffness.
    • The temperatures of Columns 79, 80, and 81 stayed below 200 °C on all of the floors.
    • Only on Floors 12 and 13 did any of the exterior column temperatures exceed 150 °C.
    • On these floors, the temperatures on the east and south exterior columns reached 300 °C.
Source: NIST NCSTAR 1-9, Final Report released November 2008

The video shows fires burning on the 8th floor, and NIST admits that the exterior columns on that floor did not exceed 150 °C. A temperature of 150 °C is not going to induce buckling in steel columns.
Early Google captures confirm that the Mail's article originally included the reporter's name, Meghan Keneally. After the article came in for a lot of stick, being variously condemned in the earlier comments as "rubbish", "utterly pathetic", "disappointing", "official propaganda", and "the stupidest article of dis-information", and elsewhere described as looking "like it was written by a child for a school essay", the attribution was hastily deleted and revised to "DAILY MAIL REPORTER".


It can also been seen that the unsustainable lie about the video being "unseen" footage was changed to "rare" footage. Yeah, right. Rare enough for multiple frames extracted from it to be all over the NIST report and seen by millions of people over the past three years.

Ms. Keneally is an American-born freelance journalist and dual U.S. - British citizen who alternates between Manhattan and London. Her bio and résumé show that she received a "Master’s degree at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism" - a "Master of Science", inter alia. Thus, Ms. Keneally is not simply too gormless and scientifically illiterate to understand how the fact that various elements have various melting points, along with forensic evidence that indicates the temperatures attained in some particular incident, especially when corroborated by the presence of accelerants that will produce such temperatures, tells us whether or not accelerants were employed by criminals with access to the buildings involved in the incident in question. In this case, it was to ensure that the buildings collapsed to provide the casus belli they required for their wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and possibly Iran.

However, years of brainwashing that induces an inverted world-view in which conspiracy facts are perceived as conspiracy theories and vice versa, along with a clear understanding that a failure to support the official line on events like 9/11 would be career suicide, leads to otherwise intelligent journalists posting "rubbish" and "dis-information" that "comes across like it was written by a child for a school essay". And to be fair, journalists have deadlines to meet, and do not have the luxury of being able to spend weeks on an article after having already researched the subject in their spare time over most of the previous decade.

There is irrefutable evidence showing that conspiracy theories such as "the Arabs did 9/11" and "Hani Hanjour flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon" are nothing more than a legend fabricated to go with a false-flag terror operation that was conceived and orchestrated for political and business purposes, and touted for public consumption by the true perpetrators and their agents. As to why some people choose to live in denial and cling to such theories despite their implausibility, this question is best answered by psychologists such as those featured on the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth video 9/11: Explosive Evidence, Experts Speak Out, or by Laurie Manwell at the Toronto Hearings.

It took NIST until 2008 to come up with their "thermal expansion" theory of collapse. That was after early attempts at implicating diesel fuel came apart at the seams, when it was found that the evidence against the diesel fuel hypothesis was too overwhelming for it to be advocated even by government scientists. But the "thermal expansion" theory not only fails to account for the presence of active thermitic material and evidence of extremely high temperatures; it even fails to account for collapse of the building.

At 400 °C, the temperature required to retain rigidity, thermal expansion of a 52-ft floor beam would have been 3.3 inches; less than the required 5.5 inches for the connection to "walk off" its seat. Even at 600 °C, the expansion of the beam would be no more than 0.000014 x (600 - 25) x (52 x 12) = 5.0 inches.

Combustibles at any given location would be fully consumed within about twenty minutes, so it is unrealistic to imagine that a beam insulated with Monokote MK-5 would be heated to 600 °C along the whole of its length at any given time. In any case, even NIST admitted in 2004 that the fire on Floor 12, below the girder between columns 79 and 44 under Floor 13 that was supposed to have failed at 5:20 p.m. initiating a total collapse, was burned out by 4:45 p.m. In fact, the east end fire there had burned out before 4:00 p.m. And it is ludicrous to suppose that failure of a single column in a high-rise would be so catastrophic an event as to induce global collapse of the building in the manner of a controlled demolition, with the symmetrical failure of 400 steel connections per second. Buildings of 47 or 110 stories are over-engineered to ensure they don't collapse from office fires or from a single column failure.

Moreover, the explicit testimony of Barry Jennings, an eyewitness who told of how he was trapped in WTC7 by early explosions prior to the collapse of either Tower, directly contradicts the official theory as touted by NIST that fires in WTC7 led to its collapse after being ignited during the collapse of the Twin Towers. Sadly, Mr. Jennings died on August 19, 2008, just two days before NIST released the draft version of its WTC7 report. The 'coincidental' timing of NIST's draft release is consistent with NIST delaying publication until receiving confirmation of the death.

NIST postulating its "thermal expansion" collapse theory is analogous to a corrupt policeman who dismisses bullets and bullet wounds found in a corpse, pretends they are not there, and reports that the death was a result of being hit on the head by a piece of paper.

Apart from Meghan Keneally's apparent blunder in confusing window panes with exterior columns, and attempt to outdo NIST in proposing a collapse theory in seven minutes when it took them seven years to do the same, she has advanced one of the biggest straw man arguments of all time. No one claims that there were never any fires burning in WTC7. There has always been evidence of office fires at WTC1, 2 and 7, and a confirmation of that is not news and will not cause anyone to change their mind.

The problem is that "office fires" don't bring down steel-framed high-rises, they don't produce an orange-yellow flow of tons of molten material pouring out of the windows that is indicative of an iron-rich melt and totally at odds with the "office fires" scenario, they don't create dust containing tons of unreacted nano-thermite and 5.87% iron spherules by mass, and they don't leave tons of molten iron and steel in a pile of debris. "Office fires" don't leave heavily sulfidated, partly evaporated steel members with a Swiss cheese appearance, especially from a building such as WTC7 where there was no plane to dislodge the fireproofing. Neither do underground fires that have been smothered with tens of thousands of tons of concrete dust, hosed with three million gallons of water and exposed to another million gallons of rain all within the first ten days, and sprayed with thousands of gallons of the fire retardant foaming agent Pyrocool FEF. When such fires are subjected to "a nearly constant jet of water" sprayed on them that effectively creates a "giant lake", they should not mysteriously continue to burn for more than three months. It took a mere twelve-and-a-half minutes using 500 gallons of Pyrocool FEF to extinguish the Nassia oil tanker fire near Instanbul, Turkey.

Analysis of dust samples obtained from the vicinity of the World Trade Center, one of them from the Manhattan side of the Brooklyn Bridge "about ten minutes after the fall of the North Tower" and thereby eliminating any possibility of contamination from the clean-up, showed that active thermitic material was ubiquitous in the dense dust that settled over Manhattan following the collapses of the Twin Towers. The dust contained an abundance of iron spheres and distinctive red-gray chips comprised of 40 nm-thick aluminum plates and 100 nm iron oxide grains embedded in a silicon-carbon matrix. Tests using a differential scanning calorimeter determined that the energy release of the red-gray chips was up to 7 kJ/g. Although reality deniers unable to handle the truth and others attempting to cover for the 9/11 perpetrators lied by claiming that the material was "primer paint", that is robustly refuted by the facts. Unlike primer paint, these chips did not dissolve after 55 hours in MEK paint solvent with agitation, had a low electrical resistance of ~ 10 ohms per meter, contained no zinc, magnesium or chromium, and ignited at ~ 430 C to form iron-rich spherules, indicative of a thermitic reaction yielding a molten iron product.

Source: YouTube

In contrast to the "office fires" hypothesis, the existence of tons of active thermitic material capable of yielding iron- or steel-melting temperatures in a reaction that generates its own source of pure oxygen from the reduction of iron oxide, with some of the material nano-sized and igniting at around 430 °C, could account for the collapses and the observed phenomena before and after collapse. Thermitic material has a lower calorific value than combustibles such as kerosene or wood, but those produce much lower temperatures when burning in air because oxygen is inextricably mixed with at least 3.77 times as much nitrogen and argon, which must be heated in the reaction before heat can be transmitted to the surroundings, e.g. to steel members. The transmission of energy away from the hot gases lowers the flame temperature from its adiabatic value, commensurate with the proportion of energy that is transmitted. In the WTC fires some 40% (one-third to one-half according to FEMA) of the energy released was vented out to drive the smoke plume. Oxides of nitrogen are not formed at the temperatures found in office fires, and in any case, most nitrogen oxides have a positive heat of formation (compared to zero for the elements such as N2), which means that oxidation of nitrogen is not an exothermic (heat-releasing) reaction. If it were, the world would be a very dangerous place indeed.

The evidence for molten and even vaporized metals is the Achilles heel of the official story.

Although the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal paper on active thermitic material was peer-reviewed - notwithstanding fallacious lies by scientifically illiterate so-called "debunkers", NIST amusingly shies away from peer-review of its own work. NIST refuses to provide details of the input parameters for its computer models of the WTC7 fires, on the grounds that such release would "jeopardize public safety".

The Mail article says that a failure to believe the official line of "Al Qaeda terrorists" carrying out the 9/11 attacks amounts to "wild claims". However, "wild claims" rarely gain the support of structural engineers, architects, physicists, mechanical engineers, metallurgical engineering graduates, PhD scientists, fire protection engineers, fire-fighters, electrical design engineers, explosives technicians, psychologists, international judges, etc. There is one exception: in the case of a carefully-planned operation to brainwash the public by a global crime syndicate that has taken control of the mainstream media, banking, and has political leaders under its thumb. Then, almost everyone will initially believe the Stalinesque revision of events, but over the ensuing years an ever-increasing group of people will realise that they've been lied to. Those who take the longest to learn do so not necessarily because they are stupid, but because they tend to work for government or government agencies, or they are very trusting of government. They perceive it as a benevolent institution, and they refuse to believe that presidents and prime ministers could be psychopathic puppets in the hands of an evil Mafia. Such people have a crippled epistemology, since they obtain their information from a limited range of sources (e.g. the mainstream media), and their prejudices prevent them from conducting a critical analysis of multiple sources.

Here's the comment that the writer originally submitted to the Mail's page:
Electron microprobe (WDS) analysis of solidified slag found in the WTC debris pile determined an abundance of iron but very little aluminum. Analysis of the WTC dust found it to contain 5.87% iron spheres by mass - which is 150 times higher than in dust samples from typical office buildings - and red-gray chips. A study of these chips, described in an April 2009 25-page peer-reviewed paper that has never been refuted, concluded they were a nano-engineered, unreacted thermitic material comprised of 40 nm-thick aluminum plates and 100 nm iron oxide grains embedded in a silicon-carbon matrix. Unlike primer paint, these chips did not dissolve after 55 hours in MEK paint solvent with agitation, had a low electrical resistance of ~ 10 ohms per meter, contained no zinc, magnesium or chromium, and ignited at ~ 430 C to form iron-rich spherules, indicative of a thermitic reaction yielding a molten iron product. Fireproofed steel members from WTC7 were found to have partially evaporated.
The form field indicates that postings of up to a 1,000 character limit are accepted, and this is confirmed by comments that have appeared and are very close to this limit. There is also a statement that "the comments below have not been moderated".
Source: DailyMail.co.uk

After submission the post did not appear, so the next attempt involved splitting it up into two, and changing "solidified slag" to "previously molten metal" in case their computer thought "slag" was an abusive reference to a woman. Following that second attempt, the comments did show up. After a poster using the name "sara goldstein" declared that "conspiracy theorists are sooo stupid" and claimed that the heat of a "bonfire" would be "clearly hot enough to collapse an [sic] building", another post was prepared and broken up into three parts, such that each was well within the character limit:
For those who complain that opponents of the official 9/11 story just "cry about melted steel and stuff", I'll explain the significance. The laws of probability, thermodynamics and thermochemistry dictate that military-grade unreacted nano-thermite does not form spontaneously, and office fires of hydrocarbons burning in air of up to 21% oxygen cannot melt iron or steel. The time evolution of a spontaneous process will be in the direction of increasing entropy; thus, a sophisticated, highly energetic, nano-engineered accelerant comprising 40 nm-thick aluminum plates and 100 nm iron oxide grains requires a 'creator' - e.g., the U.S. or Israeli military.
It's all very well saying fires are "hot", but an exothermic reaction (combustion) only releases energy equal to the difference in heats of formation of the reactants and the products. Office fires must heat the 79% nitrogen inherent in air, which is intimately part of the mix. Heat does not flow from cooler to warmer zones unless work is performed by an external agent, e.g. as in a refrigerator. Thus, the heat released of 13.1 kJ/g of oxygen consumed - or less in a fuel-rich, oxygen-depleted, black smoke-generating office fire - produces gas temperatures below the melting points of iron and steel after heat is transmitted from the gaseous product to the environment such as steel members. These can approach, but never reach or exceed, the gas temperatures.
On the other hand, the thermitic reaction produces iron-melting temperatures of ~ 2,500 C because the aluminum burns with pure oxygen that has been taken from the iron oxide. Molten elemental iron is actually one of the products. This is why the National Fire Protection Association NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations (19.2.4, 2001 Edition) points out that melted steel or concrete is a sign of exotic accelerants such as thermite. Reams and literally tons of multiple, corroborating evidence proves beyond doubt that WTC1, 2 and 7 were taken down in controlled demolitions and, by extension, the Arabs were 9/11 patsies not perpetrators.
The first attempt at posting the first section was unsuccessful. Hours later, in a second attempt, the suspected sources for the nano-thermite were revised from "the U.S. or Israeli military" to "the U.S. military". Pass! The comment was accepted this time. So apparently the Mail's computer deems "Israeli" to be a dirty word - at least, in any discussion about 9/11.

The second part did not appear. In case they had set their filter to censor discussion of "Israeli agents", the word "agent" was changed to "device" and resubmitted, but to no avail.

It's no surprise that the Mail's Managing Director (since 1994) is Guy Zitter, a "British" Jew with a BSc in commerce, who was a senior Finance Officer for the Seychelles government and used to run a nightclub there.


As will be demonstrated below, newspapers run by Zionist Jews have a powerful motive to mislead the public regarding the events of 9/11/01. Given that Daily Mail writers include Zionist Jew Melanie Phillips who peddles the official story about "al Qaeda" and even posted speculative nonsense about Iranian involvement in 9/11 now that Zionist warmongers have set their sights on Iran, and the rabidly Zionist Richard Littlejohn who draws readers in with his 'humor' and then sells them a bunch of bull about a "war [that] the Islamonazis have declared on our civilisation", the evidence points towards Guy Zitter being a Zionist Jew.

Proof of Israel's central role in 9/11

It is proven beyond the slightest shadow of doubt that Israeli agents had foreknowledge of 9/11, and together with scientific forensic proof of controlled demolitions of WTC1, 2 and 7 along with the sheer implausibility of many elements of the official account such as Hani Hanjour flying a Boeing 757 into the first floor of the Pentagon at 530 mph with the engines clearing the lawn by a couple of feet, this wasn't simply a case of LIHOP. It wasn't merely a question of Zionists who were aware of a Muslim aircraft hijacking plot yet purposely let it happen. It was MIHOP: criminal Zionist Jews planned and orchestrated the 9/11 attacks. They made it happen on purpose and made damn sure that the Twin Towers collapsed killing thousands of people, so that Israel's so-called "allies" would be sufficiently outraged to wage war on Israel's foes. See The "Dancing Israelis" FBI Report - Debunked for full analysis and links to sources.

In late September 2001, a large-scale 37-nation poll of world opinion carried out by Gallup International found Mexico to be more opposed to the Afghanistan war than almost any other - if not any other - nation, with 94% of Mexicans favoring a legal response in the form of extradition and trial, rather than military action. A couple weeks later, Mossad agent Salvador Guersson Smecke and Israeli illegal immigrant Saur Ben Zvi were caught red-handed and arrested inside the Mexican Congress chamber in possession of guns, grenades, dynamite, detonators and wiring while posing as "press photographers". That failed false-flag operation, on October 10, 2001, was aimed at boosting Mexican support for the war, a mere three days into the invasion.

The very first people arrested on suspicion of involvement in the 9/11 attacks turned out to be five Israeli Jews: Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg (Sivan's brother), Oded Ellner, Yaron Shmuel and Omer Marmari. Their white Urban Moving Systems van was stopped and they were arrested within hours of the attacks, on the afternoon of 9/11/01. Sivan Kurzberg, Ellner and Shmuel had been observed by several eyewitnesses at the rear parking lot of the Doric apartment complex in Union City, New Jersey. They were seen atop the van with cameras, high-fiving, smiling, joking with cries of joy and mockery, hugging each other, and taking photographs and video of the Twin Towers within a few minutes of the first plane impact.

Source: KURZBERG, SIVAN ET AL (FBI report), Section 5

In fact, they were seen filming atop the van before the local news radio station 1010 WINS had even broken the news of the first plane crash. The station actually had one of its sales team account executives on her cell phone to its newsroom before the first plane crashed after she noticed it was too low and was going to crash, and so were quickly able to patch her on air to provide a live report. When seen, Ellner was kneeling at the back of the van facing New York City with his camera and Kurzberg and Shmuel were facing him. After their film was developed and processed by the FBI, the photographs depicted all three Israelis visibly smiling. In one photo, Kurzberg could be seen flicking a lighter like he was at a rock concert as the North Tower burned in the background. This jovial celebration was taking place before the second impact, when innocent bystanders believed the incident was merely a tragic accident.
When arrested, the Israelis - dubbed the "High-Fivers" by the FBI - were found to have airline tickets with immediate travel dates for destinations world-wide, and tie-ins to 9/11.

Original source: The Record (Bergen County)

Early reports said that these "tie-ins" were "maps of the city" with "certain places highlighted" linking the Israelis to the "bombing plot". Carl Cameron's subsequent Fox News report of 12/12/01 told of a "highly placed investigator" who admitted that there were tie-ins, but refused to provide details. The investigator stated, "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9-11 is classified, I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information." In other words, there is evidence linking them, but the investigator can't confirm the early reports regarding maps because Israel is too high in the pecking order.

Marc Perelman of New York's Jewish weekly The Forward reported on March 15, 2002 that the FBI had concluded that at least two of the Israelis were agents working for the Mossad, and their employer Urban Moving Systems Incorporated was a suspected intelligence front. On September 14, 2001, Urban's owner Dominick Suter fled the U.S. for Israel. Perelman also tells on video of how he was able to confirm that, according to the FBI, two of the five Israelis were "Mossad agents". Christopher Ketcham says the transcripts of the Carl Cameron report were later removed from the Fox News website following pressure from Abe Foxman of the ADL, and replaced with the rather Orwellian message: "This story no longer exists".

The FBI documents on the five Israelis were heavily redacted before release, with the more politically sensitive parts blanked out and classified until 2030 or 2035. Nevertheless, the information retained shows that Paul Kurzberg worked for the Jewish Agency, and his brother Sivan's job in Israel had involved hunting Arabs of whom the Zionist regime did not approve. The FBI documents also show how the NS-2C Unit of its "National Security Division" from FBI Headquarters, Washington, D.C., in a communication dated 09/24/2001, ordered FBI-Newark to call off its investigation of the Israelis and to "assist US Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in any INS proceedings for the five Israeli Nationals in detention at the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York". Dual US-Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff, who co-authored the USA Patriot Act" and headed the Justice Department's Criminal Division in the aftermath of 9/11, is a prime suspect for pulling strings to get the Israelis released and sent home.

All three Israelis lied, providing conflicting alibis of how they came to be seen at the Doric parking lot within such a short time of the first plane crash. Their alibis were physically impossible, given the time available for one of them to receive a telephone call from a friend alerting him to the news of a plane crash, then to read about the event on the Israeli news site YNET.co.il and the U.S. site CNN.com on two of their moving company's sixteen computers, then for the three of them to make the bizarre decision that it would be worth leaving their workplace - and risk the wrath of their boss who was "tight with money" and normally did not let his employees take his vans for personal use - to "document" for "history" a simple plane crash that no innocent person could have known would turn out to be the defining event of the turn of the century, to gather up their cameras which they luckily had with them at work that day and run out to their employer's van, to drive through rush hour traffic on what is normally a four to five-minute journey as they thought of a suitable location on the fly, make a left turn into an apartment block and drive around to the rear parking lot, get out and climb onto the roof of the van with their cameras, ending up at a location where one of them (Sivan Kurzberg) had been sighted the previous day posing as a "construction worker", all of this having to occur within a few minutes before the local news radio station had broken the news of the first plane crash. In their first alibis, Shmuel claimed they were on the West Side Highway in New York City at the time of the "incident", Kurzberg said they first climbed onto the Urban Moving Systems roof and were then stuck in heavy traffic before arriving at Doric, and Ellner claimed they stopped at a Gulf gas station on the way to Doric after hearing of the first plane crash. Ellner's new, improved alibi was the variation in which he received a telephone call from a friend alerting him to the first plane crash, and two of the Israelis then spent "a few minutes" reading about the event on CNN.com and YNET.co.il before setting off to Doric.

In the real world, as opposed to some fantasy dreamed up by tinfoil conspiracy kooks or concocted by inveterate liars about nineteen Arabs with box cutters, events occur in a certain well-defined order that all observers can agree on, unless they are traveling at relativistic velocities or someone has invented a way of bending the local space-time manifold. Websites such as CNN.com did not carry the news until after 8:49:34, and the first reports were of a fire, not a plane crash. Traffic to news sites was so heavy that many servers collapsed. CNN.com and the Israeli news site YNET.co.il did not have news posted about the first plane crash at a time such that several Israelis could browse the internet and read about it on Urban Moving's computers for a "few minutes" (which would imply that there was already so much detail about the event on news sites that it must have been long after the first impact), then go on a four or five-minute journey through rush-hour traffic, make a left turn and drive around to a parking lot at the back of an apartment complex, jump out and climb onto the top of the van and turn on their cameras, all before the local AM news radio station 1010 WINS was able to broadcast its breaking news report from a WINS account executive who was on scene and actually on her cell phone to the WINS newsroom before the first plane crashed. And all in the time it takes for a Doric apartment resident to be prompted to look out of the window by the sound of the impact or explosion as the first plane slammed into the North Tower at approximately 8:46:30 a.m., to scan the area for a minute or two before observing the smoke from the WTC, then to "immediately" telephone her friend, and for her friend to grab her binoculars and look out of the window and see the three Israelis atop the van. No browsing the internet, leaving work to go on a drive through rush-hour traffic, or climbing onto the roof of a van required. And all in the time it takes another eyewitness at Doric to notice the disaster, to walk along to an apartment to inform his colleague within five minutes of the first impact, and for the colleague to stand up from painting the baseboard and look out of the window to see the three Israelis atop the van.

The Doric location afforded an excellent view of both the North and South Towers across the Hudson River in New York City, and was an ideal location for recording video footage of planes approaching each Tower - one from the north and one from the south. In contrast, the Urban Moving Systems office and warehouse was north of the World Trade Center, and although it provided a view of the top of the North Tower, it would have been a lousy choice for anyone planning to "document" an event that included a plane approaching from the south to crash into the South Tower. Moreover, the Israelis quickly left the parking lot after the second plane crash, which would be puzzling behavior for wannabe journalists who'd just seen two plane crashes and were not to know there wouldn't be a third. At the time they were seen celebrating the first plane crash they were not out on a delivery or collection as part of their job. Oded Ellner later said on Israeli TV that their purpose was to "document the event".

No evidence for the "nineteen Arabs with box cutters" tinfoil conspiracy theory


There is no credible evidence that Arab "hijackers" were on any of the four 9/11 planes. Mossad agents posing as "art students" - agents of the true 9/11 perpetrators - had been concentrated around the Hollywood, Florida area, which is where 15 of the 19 alleged hijackers were living in June 2001.

A memorandum by Gerald Shea features a document known as the DEA report, which describes how more than a hundred Israelis were in the U.S. posing as "art students" between January 2000 and September 2001, and attempting to penetrate U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) offices and other federal buildings including 36 sensitive Department of Defense (DoD) sites. Shea writes:
A third principal was Hanan Serfaty (or Sarfati), a team leader residing in Hollywood, Florida. When questioned by the DEA in Tampa, Florida, on March 1, 2001, he had in his possession bank deposit slips amounting to more than $100,000 from December 2000 through the first quarter of 2001, and withdrawal slips for slightly less than that amount during the period. Mr. Serfaty served in the Israeli military between the ages of 18 and 21, but refused to disclose to the DEA his activities between the ages of 21 and 24, including his activities since his U.S. arrival at age 23 in 2000.14 Another was Peer Segalovitz of Tamarac, Florida (about 20 miles west of Hollywood—see MAP 1), an active officer in an Israeli special forces battalion who commanded 80 men in the Golan Heights. He was detained in Orlando on May 3, 2001.
Shea continues:
...in June 2001, just two or three months before the September 11 hijackings, 15 of the 19 future hijackers were also living in Hollywood, nine in the town itself and six in surrounding towns (see Exhibit B and MAPS 1 and 2). Hollywood, for months, had been and would continue to be the staging ground for the hijacking of the World Trade Center Planes and the Pennsylvania Plane. Among the Israeli groups, more than 30 lived in the Hollywood area, 10 in Hollywood itself.
Map 1 in the memorandum covers the Hollywood, Florida area.

Source: The Gerald Shea memorandum on the DEA Report

Anyone believing the official version of events should have been asking what the hell were so many Israeli spies doing in the U.S., supposedly an "ally" of Israel, which is a country the size of New Jersey. After all, Israel's enemies are supposed to be the Palestinians and neighboring Arab states. Any Palestinian "terrorist" who wanted to blow up Israelis would simply go ahead and do so, not go traveling around the globe and training for months or years to become a pilot. And if the Mossad were so hot on tracking Arab terrorists and there really had been an "Arab" plot to crash planes into the World Trade Center, then they should have provided a public warning so that everyone could have been evacuated. Of course, the Mossad did warn some people. The two hours' advance warning of an attack on the WTC transmitted through Odigo, the Israeli instant messaging company with offices in Herzliya and New York, was probably sent to some individuals at the level of vice-president or above. Larry Silverstein was well aware that he and his children could not turn up for work at the WTC on the morning of 9/11.

An important part of these Mossad agents' job was to craft the "Arabs did 9/11" legend by stealing passports and finding Arabs to frame, for example by carefully observing the movements of Saudi Airlines flight engineers who'd been sent to Florida for pilot training because the airline was eliminating flight engineers from its three-member crews. The program had ended for some of the engineers shortly before 9/11, which is why they were leaving the Vero Beach, Florida area around that time. Problem was, it meant that many of the "dead hijackers" would turn up alive and indignant, probably in Saudi Arabia, and those pushing the legend would have to resort to claiming it was just lots of cases of mistaken identity. A good exposition of the frame-up and the evolving list of hijackers' names can be found in Paul Zarembka's The Hidden History of 9-11.

Source: Paul Zarembka The Hidden History of 9-11

If Satam al-Suqami, Waleed al-Shehri and Wail al-Shehri had been on the flight manifests, the authorities would not have initially claimed Adnan Bukhari, Ameer Bukhari and Amer Kamfar as hijackers in their place. Adnan was found to be alive and living in Florida. Ameer died in a small plane crash on September 11, 2000 - exactly one year too early. On September 14, 2001, Kamfar was reported as being possibly alive and "armed with an AK-47", and then he turned out to be alive and innocent and living in Mecca: one of those flight engineer / pilots who'd been recalled from Vero Beach to Saudi Arabia. And given that Ameer Bukhari had been dead for a year and Adnan Bukhari was not a hijacker, the claim that their names were on paperwork relating to a rented 2001 silver-blue Nissan Altima found at Portland International Jetport, Maine, was a lie. The alternative is a story that makes no sense: that Atta rented a Mitsubishi sedan in his real name, then bizarrely abandoned the Mitsubishi at Boston's Logan Airport and inexplicably rented a Nissan using identities stolen from the Bukharis to travel to Portland with Alomari on a journey that meant they would risk missing their connecting flight with the consequent failure of their mission.

Of course, the Portland diversion was a necessary part of the legend because this was the only video footage the authorities had of any of the "hijackers" at an airport within days of 9/11. The grainy "surveillance video" that lacked a time stamp, purportedly of "hijackers" at Washington Dulles, was not released until July 2004. And they also had images of Atta and Alomari at a Portland ATM in which their faces were clear enough for a positive identification. The Portland narrative provided the opportunity for Atta's baggage to be 'found' with lots of incriminating 'evidence' after the baggage supposedly missed Atta's final flight, as if a suicide pilot would choose to take their last will and testament with them on a plane that they were planning to crash into a skyscraper, rather than leave it some place where it would certainly be found (or destroy it instead, if they didn't want it to be found).

For anyone in need of "Saudi suicide pilots" to frame as patsies, the deceased pilot Ameer Bukhari, a Saudi Arabian national of Vero Beach, Florida, would have been an ideal choice provided they could keep the lid on the fact that he had died in the "wrong" year. The "Alomari" hijacker was originally Abdul Rahman Alomari, a pilot, friend and neighbor of Adnan Bukhari. When Alomari was found to be alive, as was Adnan Bukhari, the hijacker was claimed to be Abdulaziz Alomari. Problem is, he turned up alive too, although his name and birth date matched that of the FBI's "terrorist". And he's never been a pilot. His passport was stolen when his apartment in Denver, Colorado, was burgled in 1995.

Daniel Mark Lewin, an Israeli-"American" Zionist Jew who was briefly a billionaire at the height of the dot-com boom in 1999, is said to have been on Flight 11. Lewin, in common with Benjamin Netanyahu who declared on separate occasions that 9/11 was "very good" and beneficial for Israel, served in the clandestine IDF special forces unit Sayeret Matkal, is an alumnus of MIT, and was part raised in the U.S. and part raised in Jerusalem. Sayeret Matkal was a part of Aman (military intelligence "unit 154"), and many of its members were originally Aman "mista'arvim" - experts at disguising themselves as Arabs. In an interesting 'coincidence', Lewin and Abdulaziz Alomari were both claimed to have been on Flight 11, and Lewin was a native of Denver, which is where one of the "wrong" Alomaris had his passport stolen.

Another remarkable 'coincidence' is that one alleged hijacker - Ziad al-Jarrah - was the cousin of Ali al-Jarrah, who happened to have been working from 1983 to 2008 as an Israeli intelligence asset. Ali's brother Yusuf is also understood to have helped Ali betray his compatriots by spying for Israel. Ali al-Jarrah received more than $300,000 for his "work" from Israel. The New York Times claimed that the two cousins did not "appear" to have known each other "well", a tacit admission that they did know each other. The most likely explanation for this 'coincidence' is that Ziad al-Jarrah was also an Israeli intelligence asset who had been recruited by his older cousin.

There is multiple corroborating evidence that Muslims did not do 9/11, and that Israel played a central role, aided by corrupt elements of the Bush administration. This is reinforced by Zionist Jews' role in the cover-up: Jerome Hauer's appearance on TV within hours of the attacks peddling the official story about "Osama bin Laden" and buildings that collapsed because of plane impacts and intense fires, the Herzliya-based Don Radlauer's publication of a report detailing the flight paths of the alleged four hijacked planes that suggested hijacking and steering the planes would have been an easy task, Eddie Guigui Shalev's claim that Hani Hanjour was a "good" pilot, and Bernard Kerik's receipt of more than $236,000 (as "rent") from Steven C. Witkoff along with a $250,000 "loan" originating from Eitan Wertheimer, after Kerik had traveled to Israel two weeks prior to 9/11/01 where he met Wertheimer, and then claimed on 9/16/01 that a "hijacker's passport" had been "discovered" - implying that it had miraculously got separated from the "hijacker's" clothing or baggage and another hundred tons of aircraft debris, survived the Flight 11 fireball, and floated down to the ground in almost pristine condition despite being soaked with jet fuel.

Wertheimer - whose father Stef helped to make weapons for Jewish terrorists before 1948, and whose family was listed by Forbes magazine as fourth-richest in Israel as of March 2011 with a net worth of $4 billion - was reading the infamous Popular Mechanics at the age of 4. In its March 2005 edition, Popular Mechanics ran a dishonest piece purporting to be "debunking the myths" of "9/11 conspiracy theories". They did not even make a half-hearted attempt to 'explain' forensic evidence such as molten steel at the WTC by, for example, pretending it was aluminum or lead. They just totally ignored it, dodging the issue with the non sequitur that the "steel frames didn't need to melt" in order for the buildings to collapse, and then attacked straw man claims, e.g. about video 'evidence' of a "pod" on Flight 175.

Others attempting to cover for their crooked co-religionists include Cass Sunstein and David Aaronovitch, the former trying to counter 9/11 truth by infiltration, and the latter by mixing in lots of straw men, denying evidence that he finds inconvenient and bringing out the old chestnut about how it would have needed a lot of conspirators. In other words, Aaronovitch and Popular Mechanics employ a similar sophistry.

Ironically, journalists who attempt to defend the official 9/11 legend are actually benefitting the truth movement when they bring attention to Building 7, or when their shaky assertions serve to highlight the inadequacies of the legend. Of course, Meghan Keneally's article could have been designed to help 9/11 truth whilst duping the Mail's bosses into thinking it was anti-truth.

Given that a mainstream journalist attempting to submit unequivocally pro-truth articles would risk being fired and would not expect to see their work published, journalists should research 9/11 privately, and then discuss it with like-minded colleagues until an overwhelming majority have learnt the truth and are in a position to stand up to their crooked bosses. Otherwise, how can any objective, unbiased reporting be expected from the mainstream media on a matter as important as 9/11, as long as it is run by Asiatic Mongoloid war-loving, money-grubbing, truth-hating, amoral Neanderthals, chancers, hedonists and infiltrators whose loyalty is to none other than atheistic self-styled "Jews" and the Mishpucka?

Why those who say 9/11 was a Zionist job are not "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists"


Those who are relatively new to the issues of false-flag terrorism, Zionism and the New World Order may be asking themselves if suggestions that Israel did 9/11 is a "conspiracy theory" or is "anti-Semitic". That disinformation has been disseminated by the 9/11 perpetrators, who love to exploit it as a means of deflecting attention from themselves, their crimes and deceptions. Any hypothesis about a crime committed by two or more people is a conspiracy theory. However, the 9/11 conspiracy theory of "nineteen Arabs with box cutters" is (almost) the most ridiculous of all conspiracy theories, since the evidence totally refutes it. The perpetrators deliberately float even crazier theories such as "aluminum planes could not have penetrated the WTC" and "WTC was hit by hologram missiles that look like planes". They are aware that the official legend will look quite reasonable in comparison, and 9/11 truth will be tarnished by association with garbage such as "no planes at the WTC", "space beam weapons destroyed the WTC", and "nukes destroyed the WTC".

The 'evidence' that is supposed to support the official conspiracy theory is planted, fake evidence, such as a "hijacker's passport" that was "discovered", or an "Osama confession" video that was conveniently "found" amongst all the buildings in Jalalabad (population estimated at roughly 250,000 as of 1999) in occupied Afghanistan within 5 weeks of it allegedly having been made, in which the only similarities between the "confessor" and OBL are that both of them wore a turban and sported a beard. Or "Osama" audiotapes, when they found it too embarrassing to bring out the same old photo each time. And that was long after the real Osama bin Laden had denied responsibility for the attacks. Twice, that is, even helpfully suggesting some possible suspects the second time. The evidence proving the official theory to be false is conspiracy fact, including ten years of hard science in which the material evidence now includes not only molten iron and evidence of extremely high temperatures (the "smoking gun"), but also active thermitic material (the "loaded gun"). Israelis with proven foreknowledge, a top Zionist Jew with access to the best Flight Termination System for electronically hijacking aircraft via a Command Transmitter System, an Israeli Instant Messaging service through which two hours' advance knowledge of an attack on the World Trade Center was transmitted, and Jews who were friends with four Israeli prime ministers and who took control of the WTC lease, and insured the buildings against terror attacks for billions of dollars, six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in terror attacks, not forgetting to insert a clause stating that in the event of a terrorist attack the partners could not only collect the insured value of the property, but would also be released from all of their obligations under the 99-year lease. See 9/11 For Reality Deniers for more.

As for accusations of anti-Semitism, it just so happens that Jewish criminals are at the top of the food chain, and all the credible evidence - as opposed to fake evidence such as planted passports and Korans, phony videos and "confessions" extracted following waterboarding - demonstrates that Jews, not Muslims, masterminded the 9/11 attacks.

Jews comprise nearly 0.2% of the world population. The North American Jewish Data Bank provides details of a study that places the total Jewish population at 13,428,300 at the beginning of 2010. The Jewish Virtual Library has a more concise presentation with a useful set of tables that shows population by country. These sources state that the total human population was 6.900 billion as of 2010. So the probability of any given individual being Jewish is about 1 in 514. As of September 2011, the population of Israel was 7,797,400, and of those some 5,874,300 were Jewish. The world population was almost 7 billion by then, and so Israelis constitute 1 in 898 of the population, with Israeli Jews making up a 1 in 1,192 proportion. As will be shown below, those behind 9/11 were not only Jews and were not only Zionist Jews, they were rabidly Zionist Jews and so part of a much smaller group.

So we have the five Israeli Jews arrested on the afternoon of 9/11 after three of them were seen filming and celebrating almost immediately after the first plane impact. The FBI concluded that two of the five - most likely Paul and Sivan Kurzberg - were Mossad agents. Even allowing for many thousands of sayanim, these agents are part of a much smaller set than Israeli Jews.

Then we have Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who as the former CEO of SPC International had access to world-leading aircraft remote control technology incorporating a "Flight Termination System" capable of simultaneously taking over a number of in-flight aircraft and issuing commands via a "Command Transmitter System". Zakheim was at SPC on October 31, 1999, around the time when the 9/11 planners would have wanted to carry out a trial run of electronically hijacking a Boeing aircraft. On that date, EgyptAir Flight 990 (a Boeing 767) plunged into the Atlantic, killing all 217 on board including 33 Egyptian army officers. No mechanical cause for the crash was ever found, and it was blamed on a "suicidal Muslim" co-pilot, a claim that was publicised by the New York Times, which had been under Jewish ownership since 1896. In September 2000 Zakheim was co-signatory to Rebuilding America's Defenses, a report published by The Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which wrote of the advantages of a "new Pearl Harbor", i.e. a false-flag terrorist act such as the electronic hijacking of several aircraft with corresponding controlled demolitions of several high-rises that would serve as casus belli for war. In February 2001 Zakheim was nominated by George W. Bush to serve as Comptroller at the Pentagon and Under Secretary of Defense. Zakheim was sworn in as Pentagon Comptroller and Chief Financial Officer for the Department of Defense on May 4. On March 3, 2000, it had been reported that the Pentagon's finances were "in disarray", and that in 1999 the Defense Department's accountants had needed to make almost $7 trillion in "adjustments" to try to reconcile bookkeeping discrepancies. They could not show receipts for $2.3 trillion of those corrections. There were hundreds of computer systems running various military accounts, but these were not integrated, and the financial records were not up to accounting standards or capable of even facing an audit.

Thus, at the time Dov Zakheim was nominated for the position as Comptroller in charge of the Pentagon accounts, it was well known to potential fraudsters intent on stealing hundreds of billions of dollars that a terrorist strike targeting the Pentagon's bookkeeping section, destroying computers and documents, and killing dozens of accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts, would destroy any money trail leading back to them. On March 11, 2002, exactly six months after the Pentagon's bookkeeping section was targeted in a terrorist strike, Rabbi Dov Zakheim delivered a commemorative sermon on the Pentagon lawn to hundreds of co-religionists from 40 countries. Chabad Lubavitch rabbis had gathered ostensibly to launch the centenary commemoration of their spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson aka The Rebbe, yet the rabbis sang "Oseh Shalom" at 9:38 a.m. at the crash site, exactly six months after the Pentagon had been attacked. The Rebbe was born April 5, not March 11, in 1902.
Prior to 9/11/01, Israel already had a well-deserved reputation for staging false-flag terrorism and a known capability for doing so. On September 10, 2001, the Washington Times published details of a study by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), which had this to say of Israel's Mossad: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."

Towards the end of July, 2001, two billionaire Jewish real estate developers who were friends with four Israeli prime ministers (excluding Yitzhak Rabin who was assassinated in 1995) took control of the World Trade Center (WTC) lease, and insured the buildings against terror attacks for billions of dollars, with a clause stating that in the event of a terrorist attack, the partners could not only collect the insured value of the property, but would also be released from all of their obligations under the 99-year lease. Larry Silverstein was a friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak. Frank Lowy, who fought "in the Jewish underground", was a friend and business partner of Ehud Olmert. On September 4, 2001, one week prior to the 9/11 attacks, the Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. moved out of the WTC, transferring their HQ to Norfolk, Virginia. Six weeks after the new controllers had taken over the lease, the WTC was destroyed in terror attacks. Uncharacteristically, Silverstein did not breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant on the 106th and 107th floors of the North Tower that day, and his two children were also spared as they also did not turn up for work at Silverstein Properties. The explanation provided was that Silverstein coincidently had a "dermatologist's appointment" on the morning of 9/11/01, and his children were "running late".

How many people are friends with three Israeli premiers? Even if six or seven thousand, such an exclusive group would be 1 in a million. And Larry Silverstein, the front man who took over the WTC lease six weeks before 9/11/01, and didn't go to the Windows on the World restaurant on the morning of 9/11/01 although he had done so every other morning since July 26, 2001, happened to be from such a group.

When two hours' advance warning of an attack on the WTC was transmitted via an instant messaging company, Odigo, that had an office in New York, the company happened to be Israeli. The Israeli population is the 1 in 898 group. However, Odigo's Israeli research and development office just happened to be in Herzliya, the location of the Mossad's headquarters and of Don Radlauer who was working to promote the "Arabs did 9/11" legend as early as September 13, 2001, with a claim that hijacking, steering and navigating Boeing aircraft would have been an "easy" task for hijackers. The population of Herzliya was 87,000 at the end of 2009, making this group 1 in 79,300 of the world population.

The ex-Sayeret Matkal Zionist Jew Daniel Lewin was reputedly on Flight 11, as mentioned above. The elite commando unit is clearly a very exclusive group.

The ex-Sayeret Matkal Israeli premier Benjamin Netanyahu wrote in 1995 about "militant Islam" bringing down the World Trade Center, twenty years after he earned a B.Sc. degree in architecture from MIT - where he used the surname Nitay, also having gained an M.Sc. in business management there, in which his thesis was on the impact of computers in the newspaper industry and how they could enhance newspapers' political power.

As for the London 7/7 bombings, Efraim Halevy, the London-born director of the Mossad from 1998 - 2002, inadvertently gave away his intimate knowledge of the operation by revealing in an article he wrote for the July 7 edition of the Jerusalem Post that he knew the bombings were simultaneous. The British authorities spent the next two days claiming that the three Tube explosions were spread over a period of 26 minutes from 08:51 to 09:17, before revising the story to simultaneous explosions.


The official tale of "Muslim suicide bombers" was physically impossible, given the actual train times of the day following problems with the overhead lines in the Mill Hill area, and the official scenario of exploding backpacks was contradicted by eyewitness reports and photos indicating that the explosions originated underneath the carriages. The Israeli company Verint Systems, a subsidiary of Israel's Comverse Technology, handled video security at the London Underground.

Benjamin Netanyahu and Rudy Giuliani were both located in London on the morning of the 7/7 bombings. Netanyahu, obviously having foreknowledge of the terror operation, did not turn up for his scheduled speech at the 4th annual Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) Investors Conference in the Great Eastern Hotel. In an attempt at explanation, it was claimed that Scotland Yard had provided a warning. However, Scotland Yard refused to play along with the Israelis. It was later admitted via the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag that Mossad agents in London had advance knowledge, although the Mossad inserted a false, wildly unrealistic claim that they did not know until six minutes prior to the first explosion.

Giuliani, who was the boss and very good friend of former New York Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik and the godfather of his young children, can be placed in Yorkshire the day before 7/7/05. Miraculously, rather like the "discovery" (announced by Kerik) of a passport bearing the name Satan al-Suqami, a till receipt obtained from a garden center at Tulip Retail Park in Leeds, Yorkshire was "found" to have survived one of the deadly Tube train blasts, and cited as 'evidence' for the official version of events.

Continue reading